SCIFIHISTORY.NET
  • MAINPAGE
  • About
  • Reviews

Stardate 12.28.2022.A: Dances With Whales - Cameron's 'Avatar: The Way Of Water' Delivers More Of The Same ... But Different!

12/28/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
Every now and then, a reader will reach out to ask me about a particular film.
 
I know, I know: “Well, you write about film on your site, so why is that even worth bringing up?”
 
Well, the answer is a bit more complex than what I’ll provide today, but in the interests of keeping it respectful and reasonably non-controversial I’ll answer that I’ve always felt that not every Science Fiction, Fantasy, and/or Horror release that comes out is worth the investment in mental exercise.  This isn’t to say – or even imply – that perhaps I disliked something or found it unfulfilling in any way; it’s just that sometimes after I watch something and consider it I find that I have very little of substance to say about it.  For whatever reason, the picture didn’t touch me or connect on any way that moved me to the point of dissecting it any further than that … merely watching it.
 
If you haven’t guessed, then this brings me to Avatar: The Way Of Water (2022).
 
Yes, yes, yes: I’ve seen it.  The wifey and I took it in on her day off.
 
Coming out of it, I did have some minor inspiration to put down a few thoughts with the clicking of keys on the keyboard, but as I ruminated over the flick a bit more I just couldn’t even find a starting point.  I kicked it around a bit, even went online and read some of what others had written to see if I could get a bit more excited about the prospect, but I failed miserably.  Now – several days later – I’ve received a few emails (not a lot, just a few) from folks who wanted my thoughts on it (stranger things have happened), so I do feel a bit compelled to post something.  Out of respect to the readership, I’ll try to be as succinct as I can.
​
Picture
Avatar (2009) certainly deserves a mountain of praise for its visual artistry – as does the sequel – but some of my issues with it lie in the fact that I just don’t see this world as conceived and crafted by legendary director James Cameron as being all that original.  Anyone who has watched a fair share of SciFi and Fantasy live action and/or cartoons over the years can arguably pick out bits and pieces of both Avatar flicks that they’ve seen elsewhere, perhaps even in Cameron’s own pictures.  Indeed, many online even today consider the first picture a note-for-note rip-off of Ferngully: The Last Rainforest (1992); I’ve always stopped short of calling it an outright theft as, thematically, they may merely deliver the same message by different tracks.  It’s a valid comparison, still, and that’s part of why I find this universe so blasé: as I said, we’ve seen it before.  Elsewhere.  It’s just Cameron’s interpretation.
 
In fact, Cameron’s Titanic – one could argue if one were inclined – is also the director’s particular version of a story that’s been told before on film and television.  It isn’t as if the sinking of the famed ship was unheard of before he decided to tackle it.  What he brought to the whole desperate affair was a contemporary storytelling sensibility – one with immeasurably more visual flash – and I think that’s ultimately what excited viewers.  Much like George Lucas engineered the technology to update space fantasies with his original Star Wars, Cameron applied the same approach and has been rewarded (on more than one occasion) with huge box office receipts.  Viewers are drawn to this incredibly immersive palette, and that’s where I tend to fall off the boat.
 
Where Avatar and its follow-up fail – as best as I can simplify – is that I’ve little to no investment in any of its characters.
 
In the original, Jake Sully (played by Sam Worthington) at least had a minor character arc.  As a paraplegic, the Marine had been cut off from the world-at-large (to a degree) because of his physical limitations; and this new science – the kind that could transport his consciousness into a body with seemingly no limitations – delivered a life-changing experience he couldn’t deny.  Once he had found himself and all of his original instincts again, he was almost duty-bound – as a character, at least – to act upon it.  This became a natural ‘hero’s quest’ for the man, and he carried that motivation through the film’s closing moments.
​
Picture
Furthermore, in this world, he was surrounded by the Navi, a spiritually driven people that challenged him to see and interpret circumstances differently.  These supporting players – some big, some small – helped him on the aforementioned quest (of sorts), albeit this was a more intellectual exercise than it was visible moments of heroism.  While this spiritual awakening redefined Sully, I could easily see these changes as perhaps returning him to his core beliefs – things he had learned long ago but lost somewhere along the road through life – so it wasn’t destroying the man so much as it was getting him attuned to his heartstrings.  This new person was better equipped for the quest anyway, so it had to happen one way or another.
 
However, the Sully of The Way Of Water truly has no grounding other than his commitment to family.  Yes, yes, yes: all of what motivated him in Avatar is in there somewhere, but it’s clearly relegated to the backseat in favor of delivering an otherwise predictable affair – the rematch with his previously fallen foe, Miles Quaritch (Stephen Lang).
 
Sigh.
 
Really?  Cameron makes his audience wait over a decade for a sequel – with three, four, or five more yet to come (the reportage has been a bit confusing) – and all he has in the tank fundamentally was a rematch?
 
Don’t get me wrong.  As I wasn’t any big ardent fan of the first film, I had little to no investment whatsoever in returning to this particular universe.  In fact, when the wifey suggested we take it in, my initial impulse regarding sitting through a four-hour film was that I could happily wait for it to be available on cable or DVD.  But as I mulled it over – hearing about how visually striking it was – I decided that, yes, this was one that I should see on the silver screen.  Spectacles, after all, seem to be growing rarer and rarer in the cinemas; and I’m glad I did partake of this adventure up in the lights.
 
But … really?  Just a rematch?  On water?
​
Picture
What’s next?
 
Another rematch?
 
In the air?
 
Walking on fire?
 
In space?
 
In the dreamworld?
 
Again, I’m sorry, folks.  I’m not trying to rain on the whole genre parade.  Really, I’m not.  I’ll always concede that when it comes to sheer visual audacity that Cameron is in a league of his own most of the time, but so much of The Way Of Water just felt like elongated repackaging of the first film, right up to the similar beats of the traditional Cameronesque blockbuster ending.  In fact, my initial thought was that the feature had, probably, eight or nine different endings … up until the time when the director truly decided his story was – finally – over.
 
Well … over until the next one starts it up again.
 
Dare I suggest that Cameron himself might be his own worst enemy?
 
I’m all in favor of auteurs continuing to spin yarns of this epic scale.  Nothing big or bold deserves to be forgotten, but The Way Of Water will likely end up – for me – in the same category as the first: I’ll see it once and never revisit it.  Perhaps he could use a partner, though, in the editing suite?  Somehow who might encourage him to wrap the saga all up a bit sooner?  A bit tighter?  With little to no sacrifice of the sheer spectacle?
 
His recent interview comments even come to mind.  On December 27th, it was reported that he deliberately shortened the flick by an astonishing ten minutes – ten whole minutes out of the remaining three hours plus – because of what he called excessively and unneeded gunplay.
 
Why … I wonder who wrote and filmed that excessive and unneeded gunplay, Jim?

​-- EZ
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Reviews
    ​Archive
    ​

    Reviews

    Daily
    ​Trivia
    Archives
    ​

    January
    February
    March
    April
    May
    June
    July
    August
    September
    October
    November
    December

    mainpage
    ​ posts

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly