SCIFIHISTORY.NET
  • MAINPAGE
  • About
  • Reviews

Stardate 03.09.2026.A: Schlock, Glorious Schlock - 1985's 'Red Sonja' Remains That Car Crash That I Just Can't Tear Myself Away From Watching ... So THANK YOU, Arrow Films!

3/9/2026

0 Comments

 
Picture
Readers, one of the things about being a fan of genre entertainment that unites us much more than it divides us is that – even critics – all of us are fans of some individual production that – ahem – we’re a bit embarrassed to admit we love.
 
I know, I know, I know.  I hear the complaints from the back of the room, from the Peanut Gallery, those of you who would condemn a condemn a professional for not only admitting such a truth but also merely suggesting that critics are normal people, but it’s true.  Each of us harbors some secret fondness for something we shouldn’t.  Though some dismiss these film crushes as being entirely inconsequential, I’ve always said that they’re pivotal into understanding what it is about films exploring the realms of the Fantastic that make them so different from anything else available on silver screens.  Essentially, they transport us away from the cares of our world to a place wherein all we think about is the trials of the hero and heroines.  When they do that effectively enough, then the dirty little secret is that we – as viewers – don’t really give a damn whether or not the scenery is perfect, the effects are inadequate, or the acting might (MIGHT!) be a bit hammy.  We’re in it for the adventure, don’t you see; and so long as that’s captivating then quality be damned, buckle up, and enjoy the ride.
 
1985’s Red Sonja is such a film for yours truly, and it has always been.
 
No, this is not because it starred the lovely Brigitte Nielsen at the height of her singular sex appeal because – in all honesty – anyone who grew up on the Red Sonja comic iterations can tell you that in print Sonja clad herself in far more revealing costumes than the actress dons for this Richard Fleischer directed romp.  (FYI: those hardcore enthusiasts were no doubt disappointed that costume designer Danilo Donati covered up so much of what made Sonja and Nielsen exceptional.)  Furthermore, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to both notice and suggest that there’s very little structural difference in this origin story than what Oliver Stone served up a few years earlier with 1982’s Conan The Barbarian (also from the works of the late Robert E. Howard).  The two films are foundationally so close to one another the casual viewer could easily argue that Sonja pretty much stole Conan’s beginnings and repackaged them (in female garb); and – for all intents and purposes – that might be true.
 
What Red Sonja meant to me and those who accepted it as an acceptable theatrical diversion from life is that it was one more chance to experience Fantasy on the screen.  This was decades before Warner Bros. and New Line Cinema would show the world-at-large what was possible with The Lord Of The Rings trilogy, and serious fans of the genre would still be waiting a few years for TV’s Hercules: The Legendary Journeys and Xena: Warrior Princess to whet our appetites from our couch cushions in the 1990’s.  In fact, the budding intellectuals among us genre enthusiasts might theorize that 1985’s Sonja was, culturally, a necessary evil to show producers that there was an audience for the stuff – yes, even low budget stuff and, yes, even a small audience – although the entertainment industry couldn’t quite afford to dish it out profitably back then.  Lessons were learned, and steps were taken with other projects as needed.  Inevitably, Hollywood got to where it needed to be; so perhaps Sonja – as a project that failed on more levels than one – had to happen the way it did.
 
But what a remarkable lesson it was …
 
(NOTE: The following review will contain minor spoilers necessary solely for the discussion of plot and/or characters.  If you’re the type of reader who prefers a review entirely spoiler-free, then I’d encourage you to skip down to the last few paragraphs for the final assessment.  If, however, you’re accepting of a few modest hints at ‘things to come,’ then read on …)
 
From the film’s IMDB.com page citation:
“The fearless warrior Red Sonja sets out to avenge her family's murder and rid her kingdom from the tyrannical rule of evil Queen Gedren.”
 
Having lived through those early days of Arnold Schwarzenegger’s career, I can assure the audiences that not every genre fan was all that thrilled with the acting of the Austrian Oak.
 
Again, I offer this with nothing but admiration for what the bodybuilder-turned-actor accomplished back then.  Even his dullest line readings or memorized recitation couldn’t overwhelm the pure machismo of his physical prowess in damn near anything he did.  Box office results being what they were, moviegoers clearly didn’t much care that there was little inflection in his voice – barely any emotion in his verbal cadence – because the man embodied characters that were both written exclusively written for him or otherwise.  He had that knack for doing what was necessary to make his deficiencies disappear sufficiently to make a project percolate; and the same could be said of his participation in Red Sonja.
 
As Kalidor, Schwarzenegger scored top billing over the virtually unknown Nielsen, the dubiously talented ‘actress’ who played Sonja in the film that gave an origins picture based more on the character’s Marvel comic book lore than it was the Howard source material.  Thankfully, the script from Clive Exton and George MacDonald Fraser wound up using Kalidor more like a plot device than an authentic person: the adventurer largely sets up sequences necessary to move their film from Point A to Point B to Point C, with the Lord of Hyrkania literally disappearing from these vignettes and allowing Sonja to take center stage.  I’ve since learned some of this was originally intended while other times it developed along the way as the writers were redesigning the story as Schwarzenegger’s participation morphed from a cameo to a more supporting capacity.
 
Not unlike what Arnie accomplished with Conan and Kalidor, Nielsen – by hook or by crook – employed much of the same toxic masculinity (I said what I said) to give her rape survivor turned warrior the fearlessness needed to set out on her own journey of vengeance.  Sadly, the actress’ best emotional moments are buried in flashbacks detailed at the film’s opening – Queen Gedren (Sandahl Bergman) destroys Sonja’s homestead, kills her family, and announces her intent to seize the lovely damsel as a concubine before instead leaving her for dead – and I can’t help but wonder if all involved would’ve been better served by not truncating that performance for brevity’s sake.  Granted, such a small chapter may not have made a significant difference given the rather obvious low-budget presentation that permeates what remained of the 90-minute running time; and yet I can’t help but wonder if a stronger, bolder, and bloodier beginning could’ve made audiences of the mid-80’s to be more forgiving than they were back then.
 
Still, once the particulars of her background and motivation are established, there’s no denying that – as a loose road picture to redemption – Red Sonja works capably from start-to-finish.  It’s chocked full with swordplay – some good, some bad – along with some practical action, PG-rated fisticuffs, and admittedly a baseline pulse of screen chemistry between two of filmdom’s most wooden actors.  (Even E.R. doctors require a pulse to do their work, and if that’s all they’ve got then they have at it!)  Along with some screen chewing work by Bergman and a very young Ernie Reyes Jr. – his curious Prince Tarn is sometimes laughable, sometimes cringeworthy and yet it still succeeds – Sonja demonstrates the good, the bad, and the ugly of Fantasy filmmaking for those willing to give it the proper respect.  (Mind you: I’d never ask you to like it, only to understand it.)
 
Any amount of reading into the film, its production, and its place in history strongly suggests that it’s the kind of project that is best forgotten.  Years later, even star Schwarzenegger calls it one of his absolute worst; and there’s no denying that it largely stalled the industry’s fleeting fascination with Fantasy, setting the unique sub-genre on the backburner for what would be a handful or two of years.  My longtime support of the flick is tied more to its camp or schlock sensibilities – there are bad films some of us just long to love – because I think there are far more warnings to be learned in studying failures than there ever is in merely imitating successes.  Recognizing a picture is clunky is, frankly, an easy task; but being adroit enough to identify the steps wherein some female representation got in the way of a film’s other more important themes takes a bit of time, patience, and schooling.
 
In the end, what matters is that the individual is entertained, and … what can I say?  Sonja did that for me back then, and it still does today.  Even with its imperfections and plot holes and stilted acting and hackneyed ideas, I embraced it for what it was.  I’ve always been that odd duck marvels at what went into creating a scene one way as opposed to others, and I totally fixate on practical sets as opposed to current CGI slop.  Logically, Gedren’s castle makes no sense – its layout, its fragmented design elements, its whole aesthetic – and yet I can’t look away from the glorious spaces and how some technicians of a time and place accomplished far more with far less.  I’d wander those halls for hours if I could instead of, say, the Jedi Temple because one looked like it was made by builders while one was conceived entirely by computer.
 
Red Sonja (1985) was produced by Dino De Laurentiis Company and Famous Film (II).  DVD distribution (for this particular release) has been coordinated by the fine folks at Arrow Films.  As for the technical specifications?  While I’m no trained video expert, I can still assure readers that the provided sights and sounds look (technically) very good: Sonja – as a project – was obviously plagued here and there with some subpar effects work, but the end results are strong enough to propel the story forward as needed.  Lastly, if you’re looking for special features?  As I’ve mentioned many, many times on SciFiHistory.Net, Arrow Films rarely (if ever) disappoints, and to their credit there’s a vast assortment of newly produced interviews and featurettes to digest on this release – far too much for me to ever be fair – so fans should be understandably excited to get their hands on this.  (I’m still wading through some of the shorts, frankly.)  I will say, however, that there are two commentaries available on the disc; and while the one hosted by critics Eugenio Ercolani and Troy Howarth is good the much better listen is the one from comic book expert Dave Baxter as it’s a wonderful deep dive into Sonja (and Conan) lore that relates to the screen adaptation (along with missed opportunities).  Sonja purists will likely learn things they’d never known … yes, it’s that great.  Don’t miss it.
 
Recommended.
 
Sometimes I can be honest to a fault; and this is why I’ll say that – critically – 1985’s Red Sonja is not a good film on most levels but – personally – I can’t help but love it.  While some might dismiss my that sentiment as me being nostalgic, I can assure you nothing is further from the truth because I’ve always loved this clunker from the first time I saw it on the silver screen through today.  (Frankly, I was damn near giddy when I learned that Arrow was giving audiences an update because their stuff is exceptional, and they’ve not let me down.)  Like gawking at a freeway car crash, I just can’t look away no matter how hard I try because – as a pure old school swords-and-sandals B-Movie – Sonja works entirely as intended.  But is it a great picture?  Nah … it’s a movie, and it should be enjoyed as such.
 
In the interests of fairness, I’m pleased to disclose that the fine folks at Arrow Films provided me with a complimentary Blu-ray copy of Red Sonja (1985) by request for the expressed purpose of completing this review.  Their contribution to me in no way, shape, or form influenced my opinion of it.

-- EZ
​
0 Comments

Stardate 03.08.2026.B: In Memoriam - Jennifer Runyon (1960-2026)

3/8/2026

0 Comments

 

in memoriam

Picture
During my stewardship of SciFiHistory.Net, I've tried to do my best to celebrate even the smallest contributions made to the worlds of Science Fiction, Fantasy, and Horror if for no other reason than the fact that I personally believe fandom is one of the best places to be.  Each of us has a cause to celebrate, and that should always be used to bring us together instead of pushing us further and further apart.  Granted, this doesn't always happen, but at the very least I feel we should celebrate the folks who made impressions on us while they were around to see it.

While Jennifer Runyon wasn't exactly the kind of talent considered a trailblazer, she still manages to squeeze in work here and there that should be a cause for celebration. 

In 1984, she graced the silver screen with one of the funniest bits in all of the Ghostbusters saga, playing a fetching study participant whose electricity caught the eye of one Dr. Peter Venkman.  And ... electric it was, indeed!

In 1985, she enjoyed a recurring role aboard the television miniseries event that was Space, an Emmy-winning project from Paramount Television.

​In 1989, she visited the wonderful world of NBC's Quantum Leap for a pair of episodes.

In 1993, the sometimes twisted universe of Roger Corman knocked on her door, and she enjoyed a bit of screen time aboard Carnosaur.

In 2015, she returned to acting with a role in Silent Night, Bloody Night 2: Revival for 42nd Street Films.  She followed that up -- in 2017 -- with another descent into madness that was Bloodsucka Jones Vs. The Creeping Death for The Nitwit Consortium.

Lastly, in 2025, she received another small role in the Horror titled Spectral Squad: The Haunting Of Sophie Lawson for IDS Entertainment.

Our warmest prayers are extended to the family, friends, and fans of Jennifer Runyon.

May she rest in peace ...

​-- EZ
0 Comments

Stardate 03.08.2025.A: In Memoriam - Corey Parker (1965-2026)

3/8/2026

0 Comments

 

In memoriam

Picture
A quick glance at the career profile of Corey Parker suggests that, clearly, he wasn't exactly well known in genre circles; and, yet, I'll always try to point out those entries that likely matter to most to fans of the realms of the Fantastic.  
​
  • In 1984, he enjoyed a role aboard Scream For Help, a Horror/Thriller produced by the fine folks at Videoform.
  • In 1985, he stepped deep into the world of Horror Proper -- if you ask me -- with a role in Friday The 13th: A New Beginning for Paramount Pictures.
  • While I don't much remember I'm Dangerous Tonight (1990), I recall watching the Horror/Thriller mostly because it starred a few actresses (of the day) that I had some interest in.  Parker also appeared in the modest potboiler.
  • Lastly, the actor enjoyed a guest spot in a 1996 installment of Touched By An Angel.

Alas, none of us lasts forever ... and I just noticed via the World Wide Web an announcement of his passing.

Our warmest prayers are extended to the family, friends, and fans of Corey Parker.

May he rest in peace ...

​-- EZ
0 Comments

Stardate 03.05.2026.B: Newest Addition - 2015's 'Playing With Dolls' Has Been Added To The Daily Archives For March 6th

3/6/2026

0 Comments

 

site update

Picture
So many movies ... so little time ...

On this day in 2015 (in Germany), Playing With Dolls terrorized audiences with its general release on home video.  Written (in part) and directed by Rene Perez, the film starred Natasha Blasick, Richard Tyson, Charlie Glackin, and others. 

According to our friends at IMDB.com, here's the plot summary:


"A serial killer is purposely released from an asylum for the criminally insane so that he can continue his rampage."

-- EZ

From Google.com:

Playing with Dolls
 (2015) is a low-budget, independent slasher film directed by Rene Perez. It follows a struggling woman who takes a remote, high-paying caretaking job, only to be hunted by a masked killer, often referred to as ""Metalface," for the amusement of a shadowy figure. The film is noted for its focus on a "cat-and-mouse" dynamic rather than high-gore, featuring a unique, barbed-wire-wrapped mask for the killer. 

​Key Details
  • Plot: A woman named Cindy (Natasha Blasick) is stalked in a secluded cabin by a killer released by her employer.
  • Production: The film is characterized by low-budget, independent production values, with many scenes focusing on surveillance.
  • Tone: It is described as a "neo-slasher" or "thriller" that leans heavily on suspense and the menacing presence of the killer, rather than excessive blood.
  • Reception: Reviews are generally mixed to negative, with critics pointing to poor acting and a weak, underdeveloped storyline.
  • Sequels: The movie spawned two follow-ups: Playing with Dolls: Bloodlust (2016) and Playing with Dolls: Havoc (2017). 

The film is sometimes referred to by the alternative title Metalface. 
​
0 Comments

Stardate 03.05.2026.A: Newest Addition - 2015's 'Hayride 2' Has Been Added To The Daily Archives For March 6th

3/6/2026

0 Comments

 

site update

Picture
So many movies ... so little time ...

On this day in 2015 (in the U.S.), Hayride 2 -- the sequel to 2012's Hayride -- enjoyed a limited theatrical release.  Written and directed by Terron R. Parsons, the film starred Sherri Eakin, Jeremy Sande, Richard Tyson, and others. 

​According to our friends at IMDB.com, here's the plot summary:


"The end of one journey only marks the beginning of another as Detective Loomis returns to uncover the truth behind the Legend of Pitchfork."

-- EZ

From Google.com:

Key Details and Plot
  • Synopsis: Picking up directly after the first film, survivors Amanda, Steven, and Corey are in the hospital when the seemingly invincible Pitchfork returns to continue his rampage.
  • Cast: The film features Sherri Eakin (Amanda), Jeremy Sande (Corey), Jeremy Ivy (Steven), and Corlandos Scott (Detective Loomis).
  • Setting: Much of the film takes place in a hospital, similar to Halloween II.
  • Tone: It is described as a "B-horror" flick with significant, often graphic, gore and violence.
  • Reception: Critics and viewers have found it to be a low-budget, sometimes clichéd slasher that, while featuring better horror elements than the first, often focuses heavily on dialogue. 

​Availability
  • Platforms: The movie is available for viewing on platforms like Amazon Prime Video and 
    Netflix..
  • Rating: Rated R for "bloody horror violence throughout and language".
0 Comments

Stardate 03.05.2026.B: 1940's 'Stranger On The Third Floor' Is A Plain Story Made Stronger With Lofty Visuals

3/5/2026

0 Comments

 
Picture
One of the downsides to researching and reviewing so many older films – especially those with rather sterling reputations amongst the cultural elite – is that the road is treacherous with disappointment.
 
Academics, film historians, and others have propped up a great many productions because of their lasting relevance and impact.  In other words, these notable experts earn their professional bona fides by knowing which releases were the ‘very first’ to do something memorable in the medium or are considered the finest examples of early craftmanship that would evolve into industry trends in the years to come.  When they spy something groundbreaking, they draw attention to it necessarily, some times to the point of fatiguing readers who just want to know the bullet points over what works or what doesn’t.  The use of a new lens or the prevalence of crossfades and jump cuts don’t typically mean much to casual viewers, and yet there are a number of diehard aficionados who call point to the exact time stamp when a director or cinematographer doesn’t something revolutionary in any given reel.  Such minutiae – while interesting scholastically – doesn’t always translate into primetime experiences for everyone; and – more often than not – I’ve found myself a bit underwhelmed with productions the best and brightest assure me are worth my time.
 
Now, none of this is to say that Stranger On The Third Floor (1940) isn’t laudable.  Artistically, director Boris Ingster clearly had a gameplan that approached a reasonably conventional murder mystery in a manner that would elevate certain psychological aspects of the tale; and – in those instances – Stranger definitely achieves something entirely deserving of praise.  Still, the script from Frank Partos and Nathanael West feels a bit too chipper and leaves a few questions unanswered, leaving a bit of gap in plot logic for those of us who show up expecting full disclosure as part of the experience.  Stars Peter Lorre, John McGuire, Margaret Tallichet, Charles Halton, Ethel Griffies, and Elisha Cook Jr. do what they can – with varied results – but for the life of me I still can’t quite wrap my hands around motive and opportunity when the villain is finally revealed.
 
(NOTE: The following review will contain minor spoilers necessary solely for the discussion of plot and/or characters.  If you’re the type of reader who prefers a review entirely spoiler-free, then I’d encourage you to skip down to the last few paragraphs for the final assessment.  If, however, you’re accepting of a few modest hints at ‘things to come,’ then read on …)
 
From the film’s IMDB.com page citation:
“An aspiring reporter is the key witness at the murder trial of a young man accused of cutting a café owner's throat and is soon accused of a similar crime himself.”
 
Though some might insist that Stranger On The Third Floor is gripped with paranoia from start to finish, nothing could be further from the truth.
 
In fact, reasonable minds might even believe they’ve put on the wrong film – the one they’ve heard so much about with its earliest examples of Film Noir up in black-and-white – because, tonally, it’s way too upbeat.  Opening scenes featuring the recently promoted crack newspaper reporter Michael Ward (played McGuire) and his lovely fiancé Jane (Tallichet) resonate with playful delight – the easily dreamy stuff of far too many typical Hollywood flicks of the era when marital bliss existed (A) without any notable effort and (B) in spite of separate beds.  Granted, this was a sign of the times, but methinks director Ingster went a bit overboard in his narrative set-up.
 
Structurally, there’s no denying what he was trying to do: Stranger sought to juxtapose some kind of idyllic pretense of everyday existence alongside the stark reality that sometimes Lady Justice wasn’t only blind but also seemed ‘on the take’ when it came to sending innocent men and women ‘to the big house’ on convictions stemming entirely from circumstantial evidence.  It’s these sequences – i.e. Joe Briggs’ (Cook Jr.) screaming denial of committing a crime to the entire courtroom; Ward’s nightmarish descent with pangs of guilt when doubting whether or not he’s done the right thing in testifying; the unnamed Stranger’s (Peter Lorre) cray-cray verbal meanderings shared with Jane on the dark city streets; etc. – that give the film its power.  Anyone telling you otherwise is clearly watching a different picture.
 
Thankfully, Ingster – in his debut work – captured the right level of visual expression necessary to elevate what was an otherwise rather pedestrian caper, the kind that falls apart upon any serious dissection.  In fact, the film essentially ignores giving its signature somewhat-serial-killer any foundational compunction for committing either of the murders featured in it: basically, he’s just a lunatic – there are references that he’s ‘escaped’ from an asylum – who abides by no moral code.  Apparently, he just likes the act of killing, serving as a counterpart to Ward (who just likes being a reporter and in love); and these two characters adequately serve as polar opposites as if that’s all the audience really needed to prop up the chronicle.  There’s not even an explanation offered as to why he found himself on the title’s third floor and did what he did to poor but nosey Albert Meng (Halton); but his presence was needed to give Ward enough of the heebie jeebies to set the nightmare in motion.
 
Though some might disagree, I’d offer up the opinion that Stranger’s obsessive use of voiceovers – across a great deal of Ward’s character moments – could’ve been curtailed just a bit.  As an actor, McGuire gave enough of a performance to convey a good portion of what the budding reporter was going through psychologically that a bit ‘less might’ve provided ‘more’ for viewers.  The constant verbal reminding of exactly what the man was thinking grew redundant, much in the same way Harrison Ford’s detective Rick Deckard speechifies a bit too much in 1982’s Blade Runner (the studio cut predicating on the suits thinking audiences were too stupid to understand what was happening before their eyes).  Granted, it’s a small complaint, but I think the end result could’ve been achieved with a bit of trimming of the audio track, leaving individuals to interpret the vastly superior visuals for what they truly were.
 
Stranger On The Third Floor (1940) was produced by RKO Radio Pictures.  DVD distribution (for this particular release) has been coordinated by the fine folks at Warner Archive.  As for the technical specifications?  While I’m no trained video expert, I can still assure readers that the provided sights and sounds are quite good as the release is reported to have been remastered into 4K from the feature’s original nitrate camera negative.  (Shadows are particularly effective in the dream sequences.)  Lastly, if you’re looking for special features?  Well, the disc boasts some other fodder related to the era – cartoons and three radio shows starring Lorre – but there’s sadly nothing film-specific in here; and it would’ve been nice to learn a bit more about Stranger as it’s been heralded as groundbreaking by so many.
 
Recommended.
 
While some of elements of Stranger On The Third Floor (1940) are a bit quizzical, there’s no denying the film’s visual prowess once it truly finds its groove.  Granted, that does take a bit and viewers might find themselves shackled with something far too conventionally presented especially given the film’s reputation for being one of the earliest examples of Film Noir: but it is worth the wait when it comes to its stark, meaningful visuals.  Those showing up expecting it to be a Peter Lorre project?  Well … the talent is sadly relegated to an incredibly small portion of the running time (a brisk 64 minutes), and it does soften the blow knowing that reality going in.  Chiefly, Lorre was cast here for his appearance (in my opinion), and that arguably might be as important as Ingster’s aesthetics.
 
In the interests of fairness, I’m pleased to disclose that the fine folks at Warner Archive (via Allied Vaughn) provided me with a complimentary Blu-ray of Stranger On The Third Floor (1940) by request for the expressed purpose of completing this review.  Their contribution to me in no way, shape, or form influenced my opinion of it.

-- EZ
​
0 Comments

Stardate 03.05.2026.A: Newest Addition - 2002's 'Severed' Has Been Added To The Daily Archives For March 5th

3/5/2026

0 Comments

 

site update

Picture
So many movies ... so little time ...

On this day in 2002 (in the U.S.), Severed cut its way toward the top of the home video release marketplace.  Written (in part) and directed by Matt Green, the film starred Peter Reh, Vanessa Sanchez, Mark Harris, and others. 

​According to our friends at IMDB.com, here's the plot summary:


"A ritualistic serial killer is beheading victims all over a city, and those surrounding the case are pulled into his world as they try and stop him."

-- EZ

From Google.com:

Severed (2002) is a low-budget, R-rated horror/slasher film directed by Matt Greent hat follows a ritualistic serial killer who decapitates victims in a city. It is noted for its amateurish "shot on video" style, poor audio quality, and thin plot, often categorized as a "so-bad-it's-good" film. 

Key details about the 2002 movie Severed:
​
  • Synopsis: The plot centers on a bald, sword-wielding serial killer, and the people drawn into his world while trying to stop him.
  • Cast: The movie stars Peter Reh, Vanessa Sanchez, and Mark Harris.
  • Production: It has a runtime of approximately 89–92 minutes.
  • Reception: Reviews often highlight its extremely low production value, with one reviewer rating it 1/10 but noting it as a "riot to watch" for fans of bad cinema. ​
0 Comments

Stardate 03.04.2026.C: Newest Addition - 1950's 'Cinderella' Has Been Added To The Daily Archives For February 15th

3/4/2026

0 Comments

 

site update

Picture
So many movies ... so little time ...

On February 15th in 1950 (in the U.S.), the big city of Boston, Massachusetts hosted an exclusive theatrical premiere event of Walt Disney's Cinderella.  Directed by Clyde Geronimi, Wilfred Jackson, and Hamilton Luske, the film featured the voice talents of Ilene Woods, Eleanor Audley, Verna Felton, and others. 

​According to our friends at IMDB.com, here's the plot summary:


"When Cinderella's cruel stepmother prevents her from attending the Royal Ball, she gets some unexpected help from the lovable mice Gus and Jaq and from her Fairy Godmother."

For the record:
  • At the 1951 Academy Awards, Cinderella received nominations in the categories of 'Best Music - Original Song,' 'Best Music - Scoring Of A Musical Picture,' and 'Best Sound - Recording.'
  • At the 2001 Hugo Awards, Cinderella received a nomination in the category of 'Best Dramatic Presentation' in the organization's Retro Hugo Awards category.
  • In 2018, Cinderella was inducted into the National Film Registry, that organization which seeks to preserve pictures that have demonstrated a lasting aesthetic contribution to the film industry.​
​​
0 Comments

Stardate 03.04.2026.B: Newest Addition - 2011's 'Beastly' Has Been Added To The Daily Archives For March 3rd

3/4/2026

0 Comments

 

site update

Picture
So many movies ... so little time ...

​On March 3rd in 2011 (in Malaysia), Beastly brought its beastly appearance to the silver screen.  Written (in part) and directed by Daniel Barnz, the film starred Alex Pettyfer, Vanessa Hudgens, Mary-Kate Olsen, and others. 

According to our friends at IMDB.com, here's the plot summary:


"A modern-day take on the "Beauty and the Beast" tale where a New York teen is transformed into a hideous monster in order to find true love."

-- EZ

From Google.com:

Key Details

  • Plot: Wealthy, arrogant Kyle (Pettyfer) humiliates a goth classmate, Kendra (Olsen), who is secretly a witch. She transforms him, and he must find someone to love him despite his appearance within a year to reverse the spell. He falls for classmate Lindy (Hudgens) while trying to hide his identity.
  • Cast: Alex Pettyfer (Kyle), Vanessa Hudgens (Lindy), Mary-Kate Olsen (Kendra), and Neil Patrick Harris (as a blind tutor).
  • Reception: The film received generally poor reviews, holding a 20% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Critics found it to be a "near miss" with little chemistry between leads.
  • Production: Directed by Daniel Barnz and based on the 2007 novel by Alex Flinn. It was released in March 2011 and grossed approximately $43 million worldwide.
  • Theme: The story focuses on looking past superficial beauty for inner character.
​
0 Comments

Stardate 03.04.2026.A: Newest Addition - 1994's 'A.P.E.X.' Has Been Added To The Daily Archives For February 1st

3/4/2026

0 Comments

 

site update

Picture
So many movies ... so little time ...

On February 1st in 1994 (in Portugal), A.P.E.X. enjoyed its big screen debut when it was first screened for audiences of the Fantasporto Film Festival held in the city of Porto from February 1 through February 20, 1994.  Written (in part) and directed by Philip J. Roth, the film starred Richard Keats, Lisa Ann Russell, Kristin Norton, and others. 

​According to our friends at IMDB.com, here's the plot summary:


"In postapocalyptic war-torn 2073, a scientist from another timeline must help a resistance group stop the army of indestructible A.P.E.X. terminator robots he'd mistakenly created, even if it means risking erasing himself from existence."

For the record:
To the film's credit, A.P.E.X. was a bit of a sensation at the Fantasporto Film Festival as it was nominated in the category of 'Best Film.'

From Google.com:

​A.P.E.X. (1994) is a low-budget science fiction film that, despite its obscurity, features some unique elements and trivia:
​
  • The Iconic "Landmaster" Vehicle: The film features the famous 12-wheeled "Landmaster" vehicle, which was originally built for the 1977 film Damnation Alley at a cost of $300,000. The vehicle, which weighs over 10 tons and features a unique "tristar" wheel arrangement, was restored and is currently in a private collection.
  • Award-Winning Recognition: Despite its direct-to-video, B-movie status, A.P.E.X. was nominated for the Best International Fantasy Film Award at the 1994 Fantasporto film festival in Portugal.
  • Intriguing Premise: The plot centers on a researcher, Nicholas Sinclair, who travels from 2073 to 1973 to correct a time-travel anomaly, only to return to a post-apocalyptic future where a virus has ravaged humanity, and he must fight the very robots he created.
  • Innovative Elements: Some critics noted that while the film is a, Terminator-esque clone, it has a "dose of imagination". This includes an inventive scene where a musical CD is used to fight one of the robots.
  • Production Context: Directed by Philip J. Roth, who is known for low-budget sci-fi, the film was released in early 1994 following a brief theatrical run.
​
0 Comments
<<Previous

    Reviews
    ​Archive
    ​

    Reviews

    Daily
    ​Trivia
    Archives
    ​

    January
    February
    March
    April
    May
    June
    July
    August
    September
    October
    November
    December

    original content
    ​

    March 2026
    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly