SCIFIHISTORY.NET
  • MAINPAGE
  • About
  • Reviews

Stardate 08.24.2023.B: The Ruin Of Pasta - A Review Of 1980's 'City Of The Living Dead'

8/24/2023

0 Comments

 
Picture
​I’ve been told that the name of filmmaker Lucio Fulci might conjure up an awful lot of different reactions from fans of his work, but the single unifying thread around which the man built his career would apparently be his commitment to bringing some of filmdom’s best gore to the silver screen.
 
A summation of his career suggests that he was active for an incredible five decades, during which time he worked in the genres of Comedy, Dramas, Thrillers, Westerns, Science Fiction, Fantasy, and Horror … but unless I miss my guess it would seem that he’s most remembered for Horror.  Even his biography on IMDB.com suggests that his career truly kicked into high gear in the late 1970’s and early 1980’s surrounding the completion and release of what’s been called his ‘Gates Of Hell’ Trilogy (per Wikipedia.org) which included City Of The Living Dead (1980), The Beyond (1981), and The House By The Cemetery (1981).  I can say that – having read a good deal about Giallo-style Horror – Fulci’s name alongside 1980’s City come up an inordinate number of times, so I’m glad that I’ve finally been able to absorb one of his masterpieces thanks to my contacts with Cauldron Films.
 
However, I’m going to divulge right up front that when it comes to Italian Horror I’m neither an expert nor a diehard fan.  Generally speaking, I’ve found many flicks more unintentionally humorous at times when methinks I’m supposed to be aghast in my seat.  I do recognize the skills and talent and intestinal fortitude required to bring a bit of blood, guts, and brains to (cough cough) life on the silver screen; and I have nothing but respect for those good old days wherein practical effects ruled.  These artisans went to great lengths to make a brain yanked out of a human head look authentic, and that’s gotta count for something.  My issue is usually that the stories almost feel secondary to the celebrated bloodletting, and I do prefer a bit more substance than most of what was explored in this grim titles.
 
(NOTE: The following review will contain minor spoilers necessary solely for the discussion of plot and/or characters.  If you’re the type of reader who prefers a review entirely spoiler-free, then I’d encourage you to skip down to the last few paragraphs for the final assessment.  If, however, you’re accepting of a few modest hints at ‘things to come,’ then read on …)
 
From the film’s IMDB.com page citation:
“A reporter and a psychic race to close the Gates Of Hell after the suicide of a clergyman caused them to open, allowing the dead to rise from their graves.”
 
Picture
​It’s not always easy to write about film.
 
While some might disagree, I’ve never been a shill.  Oh, I may enjoy a flick more than the next bloke; and – as a consequence – I might encourage more to see a B-Movie or some direct-to-DVD project, but I only do that when I find the level of enjoyment and appreciation both notable and worth sharing with the reading audience.  Honestly, folks: I get nothing in return for putting my two cents out there in cyberspace.  I’m not compensated for anything that I pony up.  I do this for the love of the experience, and I hope that always shows.
 
But when I have to go about the uncomfortable business of dismantling popular myths that have surrounded a popular commodity?  Well, yes, that does get a bit daunting at times … and that’s what I have to do today: despite everything you’ve read and/or heard, Fulci’s City Of The Living Dead is very little more than a visually visceral encounter with some of filmdom’s most dubious zombies … and even that’s saying something.
 
As a fan of practice effects work, I certainly give props to the filmmaker and his cast and crew.  There are a handful of sequences involving the re-animated dead that work nicely, but still even for an 80’s incarnation of zombiehood this one is occasionally half-baked.  In one segment, it looks like little more than colored pasta has been mushed all over the actress’ pretty face; and – especially for this development – I’m left wondering why?  Is this supposed to resemble maggots?  Or what happened to this otherwise lovely dead lady in life to leave only her face in such a curious state?  And now how am I ever supposed to eat pasta comfortably again?
 
Also, City feels like an incomplete whole.  No character gets fully introduced – they’re more like chess pawns being moved around a board than they are real people – and this gives much of the production a feeling of artificiality.  Unless I completely missed it (which is possible), I’m left wondering why the central priest committed suicide in the first place, the act that apparently sets all of this affair into motion.  Sadly, it’s never given wider context – other than to serve as the catalyst for Hell being opened up – and, thus, City feels a bit lacking.  Some of this may be owed to the fact that Fulci’s film is only the beginning to a trilogy; and, if that’s the case, then so be it.  Each chapter should still function independently with its own strengths and weaknesses, and this one just doesn’t.
 
And – as long as I’m on the point – what’s with the big finish?
 
We’re told that the gate can be closed, and our characters go about the task of seeing it shut necessarily.  However, once they emerge from the underground, they’re met by a happy John-John – the youngster they saved earlier – who comes running to them … only for the screen to freeze, visually crack, and a frightened scream curdles the audience’s blood!  So … what happened?  Did they die?  If so … why?  What killed them?  Was the gate left open, or were there zombies left outside of Hell even in the aftermath?  The film gives absolutely zero explanation, and I suspect Fulci scripted it this way not so that there’d be any ambiguity but rather the obvious hint that there’s more to come.  As I said, this destroys any prospect of City working on its own merits, and I wonder if it fostered only more confusion than it did anything else.
 
Picture
Functionally, City does have a nice aesthetic.  There’s a bit of doom and gloom – all of it shrounded in a pervasive fog – everywhere that the camera looks, and Fulci imbues the feature with a bit of unpredictability that also serves the story well.  1981’s Dead & Buried (from director Gary Sherman) did this exceedingly well: in that chiller, a small coastal shipping village hid a dark secret regarding a populace that was (similarly) less than human, and the camerawork went to great pains to amp up the tension while keeping reality just out of reach and/or focus.  Thematically, City feels like it could be in that same territory – there’s vastly more that we don’t know than we ever do – and I can’t help but wonder if these two villages aren’t part and parcel of the same map.  Who knows?  Maybe they’re twin cities!  But Sherman provided a definitive answer to the madness in his quarters that Fulci plainly ignores, making his the lesser of two evils in more ways than one.
 
Still … if you’re a fan of seeing a person’s brain ripped out of their head?  Why, you’ll be giddy with delight on more than a single occasion!  It’s deliciously gruesome – just as it should be – and such gore appears to be all that Fulci intended.  On that front, he achieves nothing short of legendary status.
 
City Of The Living Dead (1980) was produced by Dania Film, Medusa Distribuzione, and National Cinematografica.  DVD distribution (for this particular release) is being coordinated by the fine folks at Cauldron Films.  As for the technical specifications?  While I’m no trained video expert, I thought that the sights-and-sounds were very, very good: some sequences are captured in darkness, and they’re curiously photographed, so a bit of discomfort or disillusion was likely intended.  Also, Fulci makes incessant use of some throbbing music that can be equally offputting; rest assured that I think this was exactly what he wanted.
 
Lastly, if you’re looking for special features?  Holy mother of dragons, you’d better buckle up!  The disc boasts an incredible four separate commentary tracks (only one of which, I believe, is all-new, but still … four?!), a few interview shorts, a Q&A session, making of featurettes, an image gallery, theatrical trailers and more.  Seriously, I don’t know what else they could’ve stuffed onto these discs; it’s an astounding collection, and I suspect I’ll be spending a goodly amount of time with it in the days ahead.
 
Mildly recommended.
 
This isn’t to suggest – in any way – that there’s no market for the level of schlock inherent within 1980’s City Of The Living Dead because there is, there always has been, and there likely always will be.  At best, Fulci’s flick is probably one of the more impressive B-Movie chillers to come out of the storyteller’s library … but the list of flaws keep it from being memorable to me on any other level than schlock, if I’m being honest.  There’s far more left unsaid than said, and this makes it an incredibly uneven experience when you try to get beyond its visual appeal.  Mark my words: my opinion may not sit well with many of you … but – as the saying goes – “it is what it is.”  Either you’re a fan or you’re not.
 
In the interests of fairness, I’m pleased to disclose that the fine folks at Cauldron Films provided me with a complimentary 4K Ultra HD of City Of The Living Dead (1980) by request for the expressed purpose of completing this review.  Their contribution to me in no way, shape, or form influenced my opinion of it.

​-- EZ
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Reviews
    ​Archive
    ​

    Reviews

    Daily
    ​Trivia
    Archives
    ​

    January
    February
    March
    April
    May
    June
    July
    August
    September
    October
    November
    December

    mainpage
    ​ posts

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly