SCIFIHISTORY.NET
  • MAINPAGE
  • About
  • Reviews

Stardate 06.02.2022.C: Vader's Back ... And There's Going To Be Trouble In Obi-Wan Kenobi's Part 3

6/2/2022

2 Comments

 
Picture
​Unlike so many in the media and general Star Wars fandom, I actually questioned the whole idea of giving Obi-Wan Kenobi this limited series.
 
Loving the character as much as I do, I knew that I was going to tune in, so that was never in question.  It’s just that – as I’ve said (or strongly implied) in my reviews of Parts 1 and 2 – I believe the movies had largely exhausted Kenobi’s true usefulness as a creation.  (Again, folks, this is not meant as an insult to the purely fictional being – as if he cares or even notices me – or Ewan McGregor: characters have a shelf life, and so far as I cared I thought good ol’ Ben had fulfilled his purpose.)  Part 1 – as languid as it felt – demonstrated part of my hesitation over seeing him brought back (really, what more was there for him to do?); Part 2 was an improvement because the writers gave him something familiar work we’d seen before; and Part 3?  That’s where we are now, and I’m going to step into a bit of the web-based controversy with this hot take: personally, I loved it … but I understand why many didn’t.
 
You see, I was there with audiences when we first met Obi-Wan Kenobi, and – despite what I’ve read all over the Information Superhighway last night and this morning – I think we saw very different cuts of the original Star Wars.  Nowhere in that groundbreaking and exhilarating motion picture was it explicitly said that Darth Vader hadn’t seen his mentor since the fall of the Jedi.  I do understand why it was strongly implied that they hadn’t seen in twenty years (or thereabouts), but you can’t point me to a line (in the film) wherein Vader uttered those specific words: “Why, master, I haven’t seen you since Mustafar.”  Something could’ve been said in the books.  Something may’ve been stated in the comics.  But it was not said in the movie.  Not to my honest, aged recollection.  Implied?  Yes.  Stated.  No.
 
This is why I’d argue that the showrunners and their collective writing staff have definitely mined the nuance of language presented in A New Hope, The Empire Strikes Back, and Return of The Jedi for a precise set of meanings that they could – understandably, necessarily – exploit in order to spin this web of theirs.  Realizing that word (“exploit”) brings with it some connotations, I’m not suggesting that they’re exploiting any plot hole in Lucas’s original films; rather I’m saying they found just enough wiggle room with which to insert this tale and still preserve the meaning of those cinematized words and moments.
 
After all, Star Wars has always clung to ideas “from a certain point of view.”
 
In that respect, I think what they’ve accomplished here is fairly monumental.  It may not be revolutionary, but I think it’s minimally admirable.  As storytellers, they’ve found a way to both redirect yet honor the spirit of the Original Trilogy – its events and circumstances – while expanding on them in ways lesser scribes could only hope to secure.  If you find that complimentary of them, then so be it: I think it works … and I’m totally fine with being in the minority.  Tip: I’ve been in the minority most of my adult life.
​
Picture
This doesn’t happen without some risk, it would seem, as fandom is up in arms over the show, calling it “fan fiction,” “hot garbage,” and – ahem – “downright blasphemous.”  And I get the reaction.  I get the frustration.  I get the overall disappointment some are feeling, and – in total disagreement with the Mouse House – I fully approve of their collective venting online.  They’ve been robbed!  Of their childhood!  Again!  (And here we thought only George Lucas did that!)  They feel cheated, and they wish to make their opinion known in no uncertain terms.  It’s been said that art evokes a response from those who partake of it, and Star Wars should deliver no less.  There is your response, Walt Disney.
 
But … as I said above, I enjoyed the episode.  It was tense.  It was revealing.  It brought a new character or two and gave them depth.  And it most certainly kept my interest.
 
Part 3, I thought, delivered a fabulously young and vengeful Darth Vader who would stop at nothing to draw out his former master for an inevitable rematch.  Lest we not forget when these two last met, Anakin was – quite literally – in pieces while Obi-Wan stood angrily over him, crying out his fevered disgust over his pupil’s violations.  Given Anakin’s condition, it was only obvious that Kenobi thought that was the end of their days together, so imagine my surprise at how visibly the tables had turned in this third hour?  Aged and more than a bit confused, Kenobi is little more than a shell of his former self – a truly fallen Jedi Master – while his former student’s evil powers have truly blossomed in ways modern audiences have only now seen possible.
 
(Sidebar: other than a whole lot of Force-choking and some great line deliver in the Original Trilogy, I always found Vader a bit tame.  Imposing?  Yes.  Daunting?  Of course.  Determined?  No doubt.  But … outside of being great with a lightsaber, I always thought he seemed a bit reserved.  Just my two cents.)
 
This is the Dark Lord of the Sith I think all of us who were there for the original films have wanted to see for so, so long.  (Yes, I realize that might sound ‘concerning,’ but you’re not my therapist.)  He was striding about confidently.  He easily chucking men, women, and children about with the Force, snapping necks, dragging them across the dirty streets.  He was a man driven, a man possessed – as all Sith are – by their pure and utter hatred.  Rather than hear about why Vader was feared and despised, Part 3 gave us visuals meant to be the stuff of nightmares; dare I say that even Kenobi couldn’t believe his eyes?
 
The episode also gave us a few more scenes to digest involving Kenobi and his traveling companion, li’l Leia, and many of them were also quite good.
 
Though I didn’t quite buy into the Jedi Master’s expressed desire when he admitted he wished he could’ve been the young princess’ father (erm … where did that come from, writers?), I did find their growing appreciation of one another very relatable given the circumstances.  After all, there was a time when her true father was his best friend (if Jedis are allowed even that minimal attachment), and I think those sentiments alone are weighing more and more on the man as this story progresses.  In fact, I’d argue that as he’s evolving to have a measure of ‘care’ for the girl, perhaps the storytellers are displaying exactly why Jedi are forbidden to love: it will, ultimately, prohibit a warrior from acting selflessly.

​-- EZ
2 Comments
Brian Bingham
6/5/2022 07:35:10 am

When the two met up on the Death Star in 4, Vader tells Obi-Wan that the last time they met "He (Vader) was the learner and Obi-Wan was the master..."
That was absolutely NOT what we were shown during the climax of Obi-Wan, chapter 3. It was, however, exactly what we were shown at the end of Revenge of the Sith.
Vader and Obi-Wan most definitely were never to meet up again until the Death Star. Period.
I can only hope for Disney's sake that we learn before the conclusion of this Obi-Wan TV outing that the Vader that we just saw man-handle Obi-Wan was actually some sort of a Vader-dispatched agent, or a decoy, or call it what you want. But if that was in fact meant to be the genuine article, Disney has just flushed whatever SW credibility they might have had right down the cosmic crapper!
No.... It was far more than implied in A New Hope that Anikan and Obi-Wan had not encountered each other since Mustafar. For nealy a half century we have been bent over backwards forgiving Lucas for all his back-pedaling where it came to the whole issue of Vader murdering Anikan (or not), and that is now ancient history. But there is absolutely no need for Disney to stretch that whole point of credibility any further. It's completely unnecessary and this particular fan doesn't appreciate it.

Reply
E. Lee Zimmerman link
6/5/2022 01:09:05 pm

Well, again, you raise good points "from a certain point of view." Your position has clearly been implied over the years. No doubt. But what's been definitively said could be argued to have left room for this inserted storyline. And to be fair: I haven't given Disney Star Wars a whole lot of credibility since it began. I just try -- as a reviewer -- to be as fair as I can when discussing the shows.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Reviews
    ​Archive
    ​

    Reviews

    Daily
    ​Trivia
    Archives
    ​

    January
    February
    March
    April
    May
    June
    July
    August
    September
    October
    November
    December

    mainpage
    ​ posts

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly