SCIFIHISTORY.NET
  • MAINPAGE
  • About
  • Reviews
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January

Stardate 01.24.2022.A: When Will It Ever Be Enough, Paramount? When?

1/24/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
Yes, yes, and yes: we fans love to get up on our soapboxes from time-to-time; and with the morning I've had I think I'll take a therapeutic jaunt myself and climb up on way.  Bear with me.

I have a standard response when I'm asked about upgrading my DVD collections.  I always tell folks that I'm holding out for the inevitable 10K versions.

Yes, most folks don't get it, and that's OK.  I don't always seek first to be understood (in contrast to what the teachings of Stephen Covey taught me ... or didn't) because sometimes it's just more important to risk making a point.  But the straight skinny here is that studios -- especially Paramount, especially as it applies to Star Trek -- continue to roll out new editions of their older properties seemingly with no other desire (truly) than to make a buck.

First, we were offered Classic Trek on VHS.  (Ask your parents, kids.)  Then, it became laserdisc.  Then, it become DVD.  Then, it became HD-DVD which inevitably went away with the advent of Blu-ray.  Now, they're shucking 4K restorations ... and in lieu of asking when it'll ever end (it won't) I just tell people -- here it comes -- "I'm holding out for the inevitable 10K versions."

I'm all for enjoying a higher quality viewing experience, and I'd imagine I'm not alone on that point.  Many of us invest a reasonable amount of capital into having a great home entertainment system for that very reason: we want the best we can have stopping short of seeing something on the silver screen.  But at what point have we really strayed into 'this is just getting silly' territory?

Having review a small handful of 4K restorations for my day job here on SciFiHistory.Net, I can say in total honesty that I've really only experienced one upgrade that truly made a difference: I won't name the film, but I will say that earlier prints were incredibly dark in place, so much so that it was occasionally hard to make out what was truly going on without context.  Films from 40 years ago, however, were shot on film; and I've read that there are going to be some inherent difficulties in restoring them via 4K without bringing along a bit of grain here and there.  But is there really that much demand for restoring something 40+ years old?

Purists will certainly suggest that it's all about experiencing art, but I've always thumbed my nose at that because I've heard directors and producers suggest that, on an occasion or two, these restored prints really looked like a completely different film to them.  Is that experiencing the art, or is it merely trying to give the art another outlet now that it's -- well -- 40 years old?  Are studios doing little more than just trying to drum up more consumers?

And may I ask: are viewers truly seeing anything fresh in these restorations that wasn't there before?  I understand that there might be a modicum of greater detail -- all well and good -- but the story remains the same.  Nothing all that new is being added to the experience except some visual bells and whistles, so at what point do we culturally just have to accept that enough is enough?  I'm all for stopping at whatever version allows me to insert myself digitally into the film, but that's never gonna happen!

At some point, these double and triple and quadruple dips really need to stop ... or maybe studios need to start offering digital codes for future releases: buy our 2K restoration now, and you get a digital code for the eventual 4K restoration!

All of this comes about largely because I've read a bit about Star Trek: The Motion Picture (Director's Cut) being prepped for release.  It was in article on ComicBook.com, and interested parties can check it out right here.

As always, thanks for reading ... and live long and prosper!

-- EZ
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Reviews
    ​Archive
    ​

    Reviews

    birthdays
    Archive
    ​

    January
    February
    March
    April
    May
    June
    July
    August
    September
    October
    November
    December

    mainpage
    ​ posts

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly