SCIFIHISTORY.NET
  • MAINPAGE
  • About
  • Reviews

Stardate 06.06.2017.A: Television

6/6/2017

 
Picture

With An Astounding Season Three, '12 Monkeys' Proves Itself Worthy Of Your Time


In all honestly, I wasn’t sure what to think of Syfy’s signature series 12 Monkeys at the end of its first season.

​Some of my hesitation to embrace the program was the fact that I wasn’t thrilled with the source material: while many folks sang praises to Terry Gilliam’s Twelve Monkeys (1995) – itself a remake of a French short film – I found it offering good performances and great visuals but hamstrung by an all-too-convenient finish that kinda/sorta overworked the feature’s premise.
  Still, I’ve found an awful lot of Gilliam’s works to be an acquired taste – one I’ve struggled with over the years – and I held out hope that Syfy’s variation would bring something new to the time travel fold.

That first season offered lead Aaron Stanford ‘channeling’ the Bruce Willis character from the Gilliam film all too often; and co-star Amanda Schull while likeable seemed far too young to be the acclaimed, established physician somewhere near the heart of a globe-spanning virus.
  Those first ten episodes were well-scripted, offering up some welcome deviations from the 1995 film, and it definitely looked like showrunners had a roadmap for getting from Point A to Point B and maybe – yes “maybe” – it wouldn’t all involve hopping through time and avoiding certain death via paradox.  The show was good – “good” in that way it was just interesting enough for fans to want to hang around and see what they did with Season Two.
​

Picture
However, in that treacherous place between Seasons One and Two, I read that Executive Producer/Showrunner Natalie Chaidez would be departing those duties in order to concentrate on developing Hunters for the channel’s 2016 season.  (Sadly, Hunters came and went with only a single season, leaving viewers with an unanswered cliffhanger and yet one more reason to hate the channel’s management – it was quite good, in my opinion.)  On 12 Monkeys, creators Travis Fickett and Matalas took the reins … and what a ride they delivered.

In short, Season Two was nothing short of phenomenal, largely in that the program engaged in some serious character development as well as expanding the broader universe in which these people interacted.
  New alliances were forged – as well as new villains were introduced – and the show took great pains in crafting a deeper mythology upon which the past, present, and future were desperately and deliciously interconnected.  Friends became enemies (for a time), and enemies became allies, all in the service of broadening this unique world for an even wilder ride than perhaps even Gilliam could’ve conceived.  And all of it led up to a season finale not so much about “the end of life as we knew it” as it was “the life you never thought possible.”

The show became a bit of a phenomenon.
  Online groups sprang up (as they tend to do around stories where answers are in short supply).  Message boards discussed and dissembled the episodes, much of which revolved around the secret identity of ‘The Witness,’ and oft-mentioned but still shadowy character tied closely to the program’s new mythology.  And – as can happen when the stars properly align – a Season Three renewal was delivered to rabid fans, with the program’s stars even teasing what big events were coming the next time they stepped up to the plate.
​

Picture
In case you missed it, the Syfy Network relatively recently did the unthinkable: they brought 12 Monkeys back to their line-up … and they burned off the entire third season in a binge-worthy event that took place over a single weekend.

Say what?

That’s what I thought when I read they were doing this with one of their signature shows.
  Why?  Why would you do this with a property that deserved to be spread out the way traditional television programs are done ... with viewers having to wait and wait and wait (well, “wait” at least a week between episodes) to have their appetites satiated … OK, hold up there … I think I’m seeing the logic in this …

These days, binge-watching has really grown to be all of the rage.
  My wife and I ignored the phenomenon until we ‘discovered’ FX Network’s Sons Of Anarchy in its fourth season (or so): we then spent the time to go back and review the first three seasons on home video, and we were hooked, not only with that particular program but with the whole ‘binging.’  Streaming outlets have gone to great lengths to take similar advantage when unveiling their original properties: this new approach to storytelling has helped fuel (in my estimation) TV’s greater Renaissance, giving talented storytellers from all genres the opportunity to do the same.

So that’s what Syfy did: the unveiled this new season in a weekend.

How was it received?

Well, I’ve seen a few differing accounts of it, but I suppose – as a viewer – ratings have never been “my thang.”
  I’ve always been more of a plot person – give me something to watch, and give me good characters to tell it – and in that respect Season Three was downright unimaginable.  So, so, so very much happened in the scope of ten hours, and God Bless the suits at Syfy for delivering an incredible season in a three-night event.  It was everything a 12 Monkeys’ fan could possibly have hoped for.  Fickett, Matalas, Stanford, Schull, and company hit one out of the park … maybe even one for the ages in terms of SciFi storytelling.

All of the questions raised in Season Two were answered, but – even better – these new stories forced every one of the show’s players to up their game.
  Even secondary characters were granted opportunities to shine, often with an hour uniquely sculpted to give added depth.  Newcomers were even tasked with stepping into an already vast universe, make some space to call their own, and raise the bar.  Not everyone was given equal time, mind you: they were given “equal weight,” and that requires stronger commitment both in front of the camera and behind.  In that respect, 12 Monkeys proved it’s possibly one of Syfy’s best efforts yet.
​

Picture
What might it all mean?

​Well, despite obviously being a Science Fiction show exploring the possibilities available to mankind should we ever develop time travel, 12 Monkeys is a constant human reminder that life is not pretty and rarely -- very rarely -- does it come with a storybook ending.  Still, James Cole and Cassandra Railly have persevered, breaking the rules and defying both friendships and the odds if for no better reason than to assure those watching that the pursuit of that storybook ending is still and will always be worthwhile, despite whatever cost it may leave on your person much less your soul.  In a day and age where reputations can be destroyed in a single Tweet, dare I say that lesson remains refreshing?

Now, maybe it ain’t perfect.
  Maybe it’s become all too easy to hop, skip, and jump through time in order to fix what went wrong that should’ve gone right.  I’ll grant you that the first two seasons time travel seemed a bit more complex – a bit harder to manage if not pinpoint accuracy – than it did in this third go-round; and maybe that’ll prove narrative problems once the show returns in 2018 for its promised fourth and final season.

But I suspect Monkeys’ fans will be there ‘til the final credits fade.

Stardate 06.05.2017.A: Motion Pictures

6/5/2017

 
Picture

Wonder Woman Is A Wonder To Behold!


As SciFiHistory.Net readers well know, I was born and raised a DC Comics guy, so count me as one of the many who was dying for a great Wonder Woman film.  She’s an epic character who has deserved a chance in a silver screen movie, especially one that could both do her origins justice and bring a welcome, healthy dose of female empowerment to a genre (namely ‘superhero’) that has for far too long relegated ladies to secondary Spandex considerations.  Finally – after countless starts and stops – Warner Bros. and DC delivered, giving the lovely Gal Gadot the central role and director Patty Jenkins her willing enabler.

​As fate would have it, both critics and audiences embraced Wonder Woman (2017), as well they should: “you’ve come a long way, baby” can now mean something to millions upon millions of young ladies hoping and praying for a role model who doesn’t have to sacrifice her femininity while standing up for truth, justice, and whatever nation state will have her.
  The motion picture opened to rave reviews and garnered an impressive $100M+ in its opening weekend.

Now, far be it from me to rain on anybody’s parade, but I’m going to willfully and deliberately admit to having some issues with Wonder Woman.
  Thankfully, they’re not what I’d call “big deals,” but a few narrative hiccups did cause me to enjoy the flick a bit less than most (that’s never unusual, as I’ve always been far more of a ‘story guy’ than a ‘performance fan’).
​

Picture
(NOTE: The following review will contain minor spoilers necessary solely for the discussion of plot and/or characters.  If you’re the type of reader who prefers a review entirely spoiler-free, then I’d encourage you to skip down to my last few paragraphs for my final assessment.  If, however, you’re accepting of a few modest hints at ‘things to come,’ then read on …)

On the hidden island of Themiscyra, young Diana is raised as an Amazonian princess with more than a few secret gifts from the gods.
  Not long after she blossoms into womanhood, the chance meeting of a downed American spy named Steve Trevor alerts the budding warrior of impending doom for mankind, and she defies the wishes of her mother and people in order to save Earth from forces unknown.  Against the backdrop of World War I, Diana, Steve, and what few friends they can make along the way race against time to stop the end of life as we know it.

It's important to enter Wonder Woman knowing full well that it’s truly an origins picture, and – practically by definition – this means there are two stories: (1) there’s a foundation built of where she’s from, and (2) there’s an adventure as our hero becomes the fighter she’s meant to be.
  Thanks to the preponderance of Marvel films over the past decade, the marketplace has been treated to a host of these, many of which have been well-conceived and executed; and – for the most part – Wonder Woman fits that mold.

Zack Snyder, Allan Heinberg, and Jason Fuchs all had their hands in crafting a script which obviously emerges from the mind of William Moulton Marston, the character’s creator.
  As someone who is more than casually aware of Diana’s beginnings, I can say that they’re done justice to her time on Themiscyra; what troubled me more as a viewer was her introduction into global society.
​

Picture
What they got right:
Raised as the only child on an island populated by women only, Diana would essentially be a “fish out of water” in a world largely ruled by (you guessed it) men, and the script smartly plays up those angles.
  Trevor (played by Star Trek’s Chris Pine) and his secretary Etta (Lucy Davis) wring useful laughs out of dressing Diana for her part in the affair as well as trying to make her understand even the most refined and/or intelligent ladies of this era were largely viewed as insubordinate to males.  This clash of cultures fuels a good portion of the film’s second half, right up to sentiments involving ‘the big villain’s reveal’ in the final reel.

What they got wrong:
Sadly, some of those same sentiments – that of women being insubordinate – ends up influencing some of the humor, making me question Etta’s involvement in the film entirely: she’s a secretary, and the script ends up painting her so thin that she serves no purpose beyond the humor (and the traditional duties of, well, a secretary).
  Rather than giving her something greater to do, a talent as gifted as Davis ends up blending in with the background, a disservice given the central theme of female empowerment running strongly through the picture’s spine.

Also – dare I ask – why would a spy even HAVE a secretary to begin with?
  Snyder and friends’ script – while good – struggles a bit with Trevor’s identity: would so high-ranking and useful an officer be dispatched deep behind enemy lines in so treacherous a role?  Were he to be captured and interrogated, wouldn’t what beans he could spill be too great to risk?  Clearly, Trevor wasn’t conceived as something as potentially expendable as a spy, but he needed a role that would keep him central to the war efforts as well as requiring action for a leading man.

And how exactly was Trevor able to reach the island to begin with?
  We’re led to believe that the place was shielded from history, but his plane manages to pass through the invisible wall as do the German fleet in pursuit.  Perhaps this was glossed over with the quick storytelling – it’s all handled on the cusp of the feature’s opening action sequences – and, if so, my apologies.  (I have a theory, but again I’d rather not spoil it for those who haven’t yet seen the flick.)

Picture
With such capacities in the field, Trevor ends up having a ‘secret squad’ of friends – generally all war-time spies developed their own; and the script gives some talented secondary players to step up – unfortunately Saïd Taghmaoui’s Sameer, Ewen Bremner’s Charlie, and Eugene Brave Rock’s The Chief are given so little to do so they’re not even afford surnames.  Also a misstep (maybe one sacrificed in the final edit) is the fact that they’re all granted “issues” requiring some resolution but no screen time to affect a positive change.  Like the faded picture Diana Prince receives as a gift to set her memories and the entire film in motion, they’re mostly lost to history … and characters always deserve better in my book.

Still, director Jenkins stages some epic action sequences, one befitting a heroine who has been around for decades.
  The opening sequences on Themiscyra are nothing short of legendary.  Diana’s charge across World War I’s ‘No Man’s Land’ is no doubt one of the film’s high points, and much of her showdown with the feature’s source of evil (I won’t spoil it) is much the same, though troubled some by the abundance of CGI.  I’ve always cautioned that the more of a picture conceived in the computer the less the human attachment, and some of Wonder Woman’s second half is plagued by that loss of emotional connection to the living, breathing, celestial body that is Gal Gadot.  (I’ll mention it here at the risk of sounding old.)

I’ll always quibble with inferior special effects; while the film has a few that tested my patience I know that gripe of mine generally leaves me in the minority.
  All-in-all, Wonder Woman is an achievement, both visually and culturally (again with the female empowerment praise); and now that her set-up picture is out of the way I’m definitely interested in seeing where the greater DC Cinematic Universe can take the character.  Not only has she come a long way, but she has miles to go before she sleeps!
​
Picture
Picture
RECOMMENDED.

Honestly, Wonder Woman (2017) didn’t thrill me as much as I had hoped it would, but that’s only because it’s two halves didn’t quite achieve the balance needed for seamlessness.
  In fact, the second half in some ways felt like the picture was “beefed up” by studio thinking – “always go bigger” even though some of the polish might seem unnecessary – and its best moments are undeniably when both Gadot and Pine are allowed to their ‘thing.’  (Indeed, if there is any justice in the film universe then this one should make Gadot a household name, as she's that good.)  At times stirring and at times romantic, it’s a Wonder this kind of origins picture is even made any longer, but let’s be thankful the Amazonian princess has finally been delivered her chance to shine.

​As always, thanks for reading ... and live long and prosper!

Stardate 06.02.2017.B: Streaming

6/2/2017

 
Picture

Netflix Cancels The Wachowskis' Sense8
​- Did Psychics See This One Coming?


In all honesty, I'm only circumstantially aware of The Wachowskis' Sense8 SciFi/Drama for Netflix: as I've confessed before, I don't stream as much as I should, and thanks to Netflix's decidedly anti-American attitude I'm no fan of that particular business.  I do check out their shows on home video when they come available -- those that interest me, I might add -- so there's that.

​I bring all of this up because I read the other day via Deadline (right here) that the program had been cancelled after its second season.

​Interestingly enough, I suspected something was up with this property just the other night when -- all of a sudden out of seemingly nowhere -- it popped up on Twitter as being one of the heaviest searched tags before cancellation was announced.  When I did some casually surfing to understand why, it honestly looked like an army of bots had gone into combat promoting the show at any and every virtual possibility.  Maybe psychics were inundated with visions of impending doom and they went about trying to change history?

​As storytellers, The Wachowskis have (sadly) grown increasingly elusive.  (I say this fully aware that being unfamiliar with Sense8 could put me on thin ice.)  Some of the reviews of the show indicated occasional narrative glitches (like in The Matrix?), and I can't help but wonder if the siblings need to wade into simpler waters.  After all, it's difficult enough telling visual stories without providing your viewers with Cliff Notes that maybe a career reboot for them is in order.

​As always, thanks for reading ... and live long and prosper!

Stardate 06.02.2017.A: Television

6/2/2017

 
Picture

American Gods Must Master The 'Slow Burn'


I know, I know, I know.  Everyone is singing the praises of Starz Network’s adaptation of Neil Gaiman’s American Gods.  (FYI: I covered the pilot episode in my review right here.)

​Now, far be it from me to jump on the popularity train, but I’m going to disagree just a wee little bit with those in the consensus.
  I would never argue that the source material isn’t worthy; I’ll admit I haven’t read it, but that doesn’t make me unfamiliar with it.  In fact, it’s been the recipient of much praise and several awards.  Also, I’d never argue that Bryan Fuller and those involved with the show don’t know how to deliver something that’s slick, visually captivating, and audacious.  Each and every hour has served up a kind of look not found on television all that often, giving audiences one loving frame after another.

Still, my position is that up until this past installment – “Lemon Scented You” – even Gods’ artistic images weren’t enough to elevate the complete storytelling to the level required to justify all of the program’s praise.
  The first four hours all had great moments with fantastic characters, but – artistry aside – there was no compelling reason to stick with the show as it lacked any central conflict.  Sure, I could agree that you could sense a storm coming, but why wait all the way until after the midpoint of your first season to introduce the conflict?!?

Hey now, haters: we’re all entitled to our opinions.
  I’m not saying that American Gods isn’t worth hanging around for in its entirety (even though none of us know what that entirety might look like), nor am I suggesting that a storyteller as accomplished as Bryan Fuller has lost his way.  What I am saying is that great characters need something to be directly and visibly in conflict with in order for there to fundamentally be a great story.  One doesn’t necessarily make for the other, and –up until episode 5 – Gods was looking like a huge pile of sugary scenery.

We’ve got a villain.
  Sad that we had to wait so long to meet him.

Now the fun begins …

As always, thanks for reading … and live long and prosper!
Forward>>

    Reviews
    ​Archive
    ​

    Reviews

    Daily
    ​Trivia
    Archives
    ​

    January
    February
    March
    April
    May
    June
    July
    August
    September
    October
    November
    December

    mainpage
    ​ posts

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly