SCIFIHISTORY.NET
  • MAINPAGE
  • About
  • Reviews

Stardate 04.30.2026.C: One Of The 80's Most Perplfexing Misfires, 1987's 'Innerspace' Gets A Fabulous Second Life Compliments of Arrow Films

4/30/2026

0 Comments

 
Picture
Ahhh … the 1980’s!
 
What a time it was at the cineplexes in the 1980’s.  A great, great many theatrical outings definitely paved the way for pushing storytelling to its creative limits.  Granted, not every flick that came out in that imaginatively fertile decade was an absolute blast; and yet almost every single feature tried in its own way to bring something a bit different to life.  The effects that George Lucas and Industrial Light And Magic had pioneered in the mid-1970’s were finally in expansive use; and as one trick or technique became commonplace these magicians were pushed to “find another way.”  New processes were emerging almost every summer movie season; and this certainly gave audiences one fundamental reason to keep going back to these screens one feature production after another.
 
Sadly and surprisingly, 1987’s Innerspace was one of those efforts that didn’t resonate with moviegoers of the day.  Shot on a budget of $27M (per Google.com), the Science Fiction and Fantasy Comedy produced by Steven Spielberg and directed by Joe Dante couldn’t even muster enough box office clout to make back its budget; and it only really found an audience once it was kinda/sorta dumped into the home video marketplace.  (Frankly, that’s not a bad thing because a great many of these lesser efforts almost always found incredible success on VHS.)  Granted, the film didn’t quite have any big names (of the time) attached to it, though lead Dennis Quaid was arguably emerging as one to watch in Tinseltown.  Otherwise, Martin Short and Meg Ryan were really at the cusp of becoming known commodities, so maybe this little film never quite built the momentum it needed in its theatrical run to face the competition.
 
However …
 
Fate often has something to say about hard work paying off.  Despite coming and going from screens fairly quickly, Innerspace still managed to see its technical experts behind-the-camera justly rewarded for their illusions when the team scored a huge Academy Award win in the category of Best Visual Effects.  Their singular ability to bring to life and inner workings of the human body astounds to this day (with only a few dated blemishes); and perhaps its this notch in the film’s belt that gave it enough spark to light the fire it did on video.  Decades later, it’s still a favorite to many; so I was thrilled to crack open Arrow’s newest release to reconsider what worked and perhaps some of what didn’t.
 
(NOTE: The following review will contain minor spoilers necessary solely for the discussion of plot and/or characters.  If you’re the type of reader who prefers a review entirely spoiler-free, then I’d encourage you to skip down to the last few paragraphs for the final assessment.  If, however, you’re accepting of a few modest hints at ‘things to come,’ then read on …)
 
From the film’s IMDB.com page citation:
“When a test pilot taking part in a secret miniaturization experiment is accidentally injected into a hapless store clerk, the two must work together in order to prevent the technology from falling into the wrong hands.”
 
Growing up as I did through the 1970’s, I can assure you that there was one place wherein families could go for entertainment: the Walt Disney Company – with its plethora of very kid-friendly motion pictures – had an impenetrable lock on what was possible and probable for theaters.  And – for the uninitiated – not each and every one of these entries were animated: in fact, the fabled Mouse House put out an incredible stable of live action Comedies – a great many of them with a fantastical angle – that kept the mommies and daddies and all their little children happen to spend an afternoon in the dark before the silver screen.  From musicals like Bedknobs And Broomsticks (1971) to Freaky Friday (1977), Walt Disney chiefly worked to entertain (and only entertain), never much slowing down even when a lackluster clunker or two (and there were a few) slipped into the mix.  Simply put, the studio just kept them coming.  Even though many of these productions are forgotten today, they were the cat’s meow – even when they were something like The Cat From Outer Space (1978) – and families just couldn’t look away.
 
It really wasn’t until the early 1980’s that cracks began to show in the great damn separating the Disney Company from other studios.  Of course, George Lucas’s Star Wars (1977) was the first strike – one that reverberated around the world, in fact – and the 1980 follow-up – The Empire Strike Back – really set the stage for a total industry takeover for producing family-friendly fare.  By the time 1982 rolled around and Spielberg released his groundbreaking E.T. The Extraterrestrial it was increasingly clear that Walt Disney no longer held the monopoly on the nuclear family; and the consumers truly benefitted from this much needed change of pace.
 
In the latter half of the 1980’s, the theatrical marketplace had taken on a vastly different feel than only the decade before.  Gone were the serious and sometimes dour Dramas; and in their place screens were filled with frenetic action, most of which relied heavily on special effects to deliver a good portion of the entertainment.  Because there was so much of it, I suspect Innerspace (1987) couldn’t quite compete solely on those merits; and it needed something a bit bigger or grander in order to resonate.  Screenwriters Chip Proser and Jeffrey Boam’s throwback to obviously more physical Comedy – the kind once elevated by the likes of Jerry Lewis or the bumbling Peter Sellers – hadn’t yet found a personae that showed the level of promise required to re-ignite a fickle moviegoing crowd.  1994’s Pet Detective would eventually do that (with a young Jim Carrey); but, alas, as good as Martin Short was in the role of blundering hypochondriac Jack Putter that just wasn’t quite enough.
 
Still, Short definitely wasn’t known as a box office draw; and the picture – which mixed some modest science with pratfalls and a rather adult love triangle – likely lacked the interest of the true nuclear family.  While Quaid, Short, and Meg Ryan mustered enough chemistry to make this dubious relationship work, it never felt relatedly organic alongside Short’s comic schtick much less Robert Picardo’s downright tomfoolery as ‘The Cowboy,’ an international arms dealer with a bad accent who looked more like he was fired as an unnecessary extra from some failed 70’s disco comedy.  The narrative highs never quite meshed with the low-brow antics in Innerspace; and those few moments when it all did congeal nicely just wasn’t enough to give the effort more than a passing nod.
 
Like Lt. Tuck Pendleton inside his famed capsule, Innerspace shrunk in the marketplace when it should’ve grown.  It wasn’t a bad experience in any measure: it just wound up being so thematically uneven that no one knew what to make of it, and there’s no greater treachery for completed art that possible misdirection.  While looking good, the film brought nothing new to the adventure … but like so many 80’s flicks it’s still a welcome spot to revisit.
 
Innerspace (1987) was produced by Warner Bros., The Guber-Peters Company, and Amblin Entertainment.  DVD distribution (for this particular release) has been coordinated by the fine folks at Arrow Films.  As for the technical specifications?  While I’m no trained video expert, I can still assure audiences that the provided sights and sounds are exceptional: the effect sequences still work very well decades later, though a few obvious miniatures might throw a viewer or two for a loop.  Lastly, if you’re looking for special features?  This is Arrow, and they do definitely set a high standard.  The archival audio commentary is the better of the two: critic Drew McWeeny’s newly-recorded one is good, but I found it a bit light in spots.  Additionally, there’s a FABULOUS one-hour documentary that should be standard viewing for fans of the flick: Joe Dante and an immensely talented effects crew take the audience from start-to-finish, reflecting on what they feel they got right along the way.  They even have some opinions as to why Innerspace maybe didn’t quite work back in the day, and their love for the work still shows.  Lastly, there are a few other extras – much of it provided from Dante’s personal collection – so buckle up for a wild behind-the-scenes ride.
 
Recommended.
 
Critically, 1987’s Innerspace has always been a tough nut to crack for me.  While it definitely stands shoulder-to-shoulder with so many other great films that emerged from the 1980’s, the script and its supporting lunacy occasionally goes a bit too far into farce for my tastes: that may not be a dealbreaker for some, but Dante tonally could’ve dialed back those few scenes and produced a more cohesive Comedy.  Regardless, I’ll still insist that Innerspace arguably proved that that once-entertaining juggernaut that was the Walt Disney Company no longer had a stranglehold on Hollywood as to provided quality family fare: Warner Bros. and Amblin Entertainment – under Steven Spielberg – finally broke through that firewall and set their own fires creatively to give other studios a better chance at getting the nuclear family’s butts in the seats for good.
 
In the interests of fairness, I’m pleased to disclose that the fine folks at Arrow Films provided me with a complimentary Blu-ray of Innerspace (1987) by request for the expressed purpose of completing this review.  Their contribution to me in no way, shape, or form influenced my opinion of it.

​-- EZ
0 Comments

Stardate 04.30.2026.B: 2026's 'Souls Chapel' Delivering Frights From The Old West On DVD and VOD Now!

4/30/2026

0 Comments

 

press release

Picture

DIRECTOR JAKE C. YOUNG
CHANNELS OcCULT HORROR & SPAGHETTI WESTERNS IN 
SOULS CHAPEL

Los Angeles, CA, April 21, 2026--MTS Pictures is proud to announce the North American release to their latest feature SOULS CHAPEL, an indie horror-western inspired by the real-life legend of an early 1900s reverend who practiced the occult. The film is now available from Desktop Entertainment on DVD and VOD platforms, including Apple TV, Amazon Prime Video, and Fandango at Home.

Directed by and starring Jack C. Young (channeling his cousin Clint Eastwood's iconic 'Man with No Name'), Souls Chapel also stars genre favorite Brian Bremer (Pumpkinhead, Society) alongside Adriana Curtsinger, Jermey Boggs, Cage Carnes, Joseph McDowell, and Molly Gill.

"Souls Chapel is my way of exploring faith, fear, and the thin line between legend and reality—because sometimes what we believe becomes something very real", said Young.

It’s an unknown point in time. The world has moved on from what it once was Ray, a drifter, is making his way through the hills of the old Kentucky. Ray is encountered by a strange entity, that promises him gold if he returns two icons to him. After accepting the challenge, Ray finds himself in the middle of a terrible storm in which he seeks refuge in a small church known as Souls Chapel. As things begin to unfold, Ray learns that church clergy are not who they seem, and that the chapel’s grounds are cursed with a presence of dark magic. Ray must not only survive the night but complete his task and make it out alive.

Souls Chapel is written and produced by D.W. Daring (Reign of the Red Dragon) alongside Robert Bess and Young's production company MTS Pictures. Austin Rutherford and Zach Jones served as Director of Photography. Executive Producers include Gary Dando, Mike Davies, Martin Davis, John Przybylinski, Micah Roberts, and LolaBeth Smith.

“I wrote Souls Chapel to prove that the most terrifying stories don’t come from Hollywood—they come from real places, real history, and the things people are afraid to talk about", said Daring.

Jake C. Young, sometimes credited as "Jake Eastwood" is one of very few actors which have had such a career as diverse. Young is an American actor who has gone from humble beginnings, as a supporting cast member of independent films and low budget horror movies, to his owning his own production company, MTS Pictures.

In early years, Young was credited by the stage name "Jake Eastwood" as an alias, due to being a relative to well established Actor/Director, Clint Eastwood. Along with his uncanny resemblance, under the recommendation of his manager, he adapted the Eastwood name. Young is known for his directorial style of independent filmmaking. A few notable titles include: A Night of the Undead and The Dark Room.

He is best know for his role of gunslinger cowboy and vampire hunter Jonah Van Helsing in the film Daylight to Dark. His films extend from major leads to occasionally appearing in cameo roles such as; Free to a Bad Home, Reunion From Hell 2, various music videos, and Lifetime films. Young is an advocate for independent filmmaking and production.
​
0 Comments

Stardate 04.30.2026.A: 2025's 'Nesting' Arrives On VOD On May 29th!

4/30/2026

0 Comments

 

press release

Picture

A Haunting Psychological Descent
into Motherhood and Madness
​

Philadelphia, PA – April 2026 — Breaking Glass Pictures announces the North American release of NESTING, a haunting psychological thriller from director Chloé Cinq-Mars, arriving on VOD platforms May 29, 2026.

Following an acclaimed festival run, NESTING quickly established itself as a standout in the genre space. The film made its World Premiere at the Fantasia Film Festival, where Cinq-Mars won the Best Director Award (2025), and went on to screen at the SOHO Horror Film Festival (2025), Brooklyn Horror Film Festival (2025), Vancouver International Film Festival (2025), Calgary International Film Festival (2025), and Fantastic Fest (2025).

A deeply unsettling portrait of grief and psychological unraveling, NESTING follows Pénélope (Rose-Marie Perreault), a new mother struggling with postpartum depression and the lingering trauma of her sister’s death. As sleep deprivation takes hold, the boundary between dream and reality begins to collapse, pulling her into a paranoid and increasingly dangerous spiral.

Critics have praised the film’s unnerving psychological depth, with one noting, “Nesting suggests that the horrors in a damaged mind can become reality in the blink of an eye and spiral into darkness.”
Anchored by a fearless performance from Perreault, NESTING evokes the suffocating dread of films like Rosemary’s Baby and mother! while delivering a distinctly modern and intimate perspective on motherhood, identity, and mental health.

“We’ve seen strong success working with Rich Wolff, CEO of Breaking Glass Pictures, on our previous arthouse genre titles in North America, and we’re excited to have NESTING join their slate,” said Miguel, Sales Agent at Alief.

Ahead of its digital release, NESTING will receive a special one-night theatrical screening event on May 26, 2026 at select Alamo Drafthouse Cinema locations nationwide, including:

Austin (South Lamar), Boston (Seaport), Chicago (Wrigleyville), Denton & Richardson (DFW), Denver (Sloans Lake), Laredo, Los Angeles (DTLA), New York (Brooklyn, Lower Manhattan, Yonkers), Raleigh, San Antonio (Park North), Mountain View, San Francisco (New Mission), Santa Clara (Valley Fair), Woodbury (Twin Cities), and Indianapolis.

With its unflinching exploration of postpartum depression, isolation, and the fragility of perception, NESTING stands as both a gripping psychological thriller and an emotionally charged character study—one that lingers long after the credits roll.

Cast includes:
  • Rose-Marie Perreault (Pénélope)
  • Simon Landry-Desy (Gaspard)
  • Saladin Dellers (Edward)
  • Marie Bélanger (Charlotte)
  • Alex Lauzon (Joseph)

Press Details:
  • Official Trailer: Watch Trailer Here
  • Poster Art: Official Artwork Here
  • IMDb Page: Nesting IMDb Page

​Production Details:
  • Production Year: 2025
  • Genre: Psychological Thriller, Drama, Horror
  • Language: French
  • Production Country: Switzerland, Canada 
  • Production Company: 1976 Productions
  • Runtime: 103
​
About Breaking Glass Pictures:
​

Founded in 2009 and based in Philadelphia, Breaking Glass Pictures is a leading independent film distribution company focused on delivering thought-provoking, inclusive, and impactful films to audiences worldwide. With a strong history of championing LGBTQ+ cinema, documentaries, and bold independent features, Breaking Glass proudly supports visionary storytellers who challenge convention and spotlight underrepresented voices.
0 Comments

Stardate 04.28.2026.A: 2025's 'Dust Bunny' Successfully Explores The Use Of Monsters In Child Development

4/28/2026

0 Comments

 
Picture
(NOTE: The following review will contain minor spoilers necessary solely for the discussion of plot and/or characters.  If you’re the type of reader who prefers a review entirely spoiler-free, then I’d encourage you to skip down to the last few paragraphs for the final assessment.  If, however, you’re accepting of a few modest hints at ‘things to come,’ then read on …)
 
From the film’s IMDB.com page citation:
“An eight-year-old girl asks her scheming neighbor for help in killing the monster under her bed that she thinks ate her family.”
 
Like it or not, there are some who would cite the name of Bryan Fuller as the creative who set the wider Star Trek franchise into intellectual ruin: along with Alex Kurtzman, he developed Star Trek: Discovery into the stupefyingly egregious descent into non-canonical madness before departing for greener pastures.  As for me, I’ve never much faulted him for the franchise’s demise as facts suggest he truly wasn’t around all that long after all; and as a storyteller the guy has a pretty solid track record worth serious consideration.  After contributing scripts to Star Trek: Deep Space Nine and Star Trek: Voyager, Fuller went on the bring such curious delights to audiences as Dead Like Me, Wonderfalls, Pushing Daisies, and Hannibal.  I’d much rather remember him for those efforts than Trek’s descent into the trash bin of history; and with Dust Bunny (2025) the guy shows that he definitely still has the chops to pony up something worth watching even if it might lack the longevity of his earlier projects.
 
To my delight, Dust Bunny feels like a whimsical recreation of Luc Besson’s groundbreaking Léon: The Professional (1994), a riveting character study shared between an introverted assassin (Jean Reno) and Mathilda (Natalie Portman), his young neighbor who finds herself orphaned when criminals murder her entire family.  In that award-winning actioner, the two begrudgingly accept one another as equals, building a fragile bond of friendship that’s likely doomed to end in tragedy one way or another.  Similarly, young Aurora (played by the wide-eyed Sophie Sloan) practically forces her custody onto her neighbor – known only as Resident 5B (Mads Mikkelsen) – after a hungry monster comes through the floorboards looking for dinner one night and devours her adoptive parents.  While I won’t spoil it for readers, our young lead owes a bit more responsibility as to why the creature has suddenly appeared; and it’s through this twist of Fate that 5B begins wondering if he, too, might in some way be the true reason behind the loss of a seemingly loving couple.
 
Fuller’s direction is terrific throughout most of the action, comedy, and drama.  In many ways, Dust Bunny is a bit of a narrative throwback to his television outing Pushing Daisies (2007-2009) where even the ordinary was somehow repackaged as an adult-themed Fantasy.  Sets and décor are colorful and vibrant, though there are some rather obvious deficiencies (to learned eyes) when even casual backdrops are rendered as visual inserts.  As an example, audiences might notice that the backgrounds in the posh restaurant where 5B meets Laverne (Sigourney Weaver), his handler: close-ups are tightly focused while almost everything just over their shoulders are wildly out-of-focus, and it grows worse as the scene unspools as definition levels constant shift.  Some might argue that such an obvious distraction must be an artistic choice: I’d rather call it lazy post-production efforts.
 
As Dust Bunny hums along as the reveals are made, it necessarily grows increasingly violent.  Again, Fuller’s expertise is in making such eccentricities work more for adult audiences, though this one is still bloodless enough to share with the kiddies.  Once more, the aforementioned Léon comes to mind but imagine if that film were designed and shot by the magnificent Terry Gilliam.  Methinks that’s the aesthetic Fuller was attempting to achieve, and it definitely works very well.  In the second half, the film slows down a bit – even feels a bit long in a few sequences – but the ending reminds us that monsters come in all shapes and sizes and not all of them are as frightening as they could be.
 
If I’ve any major complaint, it would be the casting of Weaver.  Her delivery never quite feels grounded here, so much so that I can’t help but wonder if even she was missing the point of it all.  Having shared the screen with one of the industry’s most memorable monsters in the wider Alien franchise, perhaps she could grappled too much with the idea of a man-eating critter being a good thing to have in supply.  Up until the point of her – ahem – big finish, she seemed more of a fish out of water than did the seminal creature … and that’s saying something.
 
Dust Bunny (2025) was produced by Dust Bunny Productions, Entertainment One, Hero Squared, Living Dead Guy Productions, and Thunder Road Pictures.  DVD distribution (for this particular release) has been handled by the fine folks at Lionsgate.  As for the technical specifications?  While I’m no trained video expert, I can still assure readers that the fine both looks and sounds exceptional: there’s a bit of special effects trickery whenever the monster moves between worlds, and it isn’t always perfect but remains acceptable.  Lastly, if you’re looking for special features?  Well … they’re a bit underwhelming, to be honest, with a few of them really feeling more like bloated advertising material than anything else.  I would’ve liked something a bit more interesting – maybe even a commentary track – but it is what it is.
 
Recommended.
 
Now, Dust Bunny (2025) is mostly a fairy tale, so writer/director Fuller does get a bit of a free pass when it comes to everything making perfect sense, fairy tale magic being what it is.  Vividly pictured (though not without some blemishes here and there), the film moves at a good pace, making great use over a few locations as well as the budding father/daughter screen chemistry between leads Mikkelsen and Sloan.  Sadly, Weaver seems almost horrifically miscast: while some of her performance might be owed to the fact that the script pulls a late-breaking reveal as to her true identity, I was still left wondering why Fuller put so much effort into concealing something so relatively inconsequential as divulging it earlier might’ve eliminated the numbing work one of filmdom’s greatest actresses delivers.  Fun.  Occasionally a bit slow.  Yet … still fun.  (Yes, there’s a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it post credits scene regarding the fate of one character, so be on the lookout.)
 
In the interests of fairness, I’m pleased to disclose that the fine folks at Allied Vaughn (a distributor) provided me with a complimentary UltraHD 4K Blu-ray of Dust Bunny by request for the expressed purpose of completing this review.  Their contribution to me in no way, shape, or form influenced my opinion of it.

-- EZ
​
0 Comments

Stardate 04.27.2026.B: This June, Go And Explore 'The Worlds Of Lucille Hadžihalilović' With An All-New Set From Severin Films And Yellow Veil Pictures

4/27/2026

0 Comments

 

press release

Picture

“ONE OF THE MOST DISTINCTIVE, ENCHANTINGLY SINISTER BODIES
OF WORK IN MODERN FILM.”

British Film Institute

4 DISC COLLECTION WITH
 4+ COMBINED HOURS
​OF SPECIAL FEATURES AND 60-PAGE COMPANION BOOK


​THE WORLDS OF LUCILE HADŽIHALILOVIĆ presents a comprehensively immersive journey through the filmography of Lucile Hadžihalilović, “an artist of radical gentleness whose films each resemble a delicately poisoned fairy tale” (Le Monde). Originally known for her collaborations as editor and producer for longtime partner Gaspar Noé, writer/director Hadžihalilović’s own internationally acclaimed quartet of features craft poetically surreal tales where dreams and nightmares are layered in embraces of tenderness and terror. Two of the four films in this collection are North American Blu-ray Premieres and include over 4 combined hours of fascinating Special Features plus a 60-page companion book featuring all-new essays by Saffron Maeve, Alison Taylor and Stephen Thrower.


Disc 1: INNOCENCE

“BEAUTIFUL AND PROVOCATIVE…
A mesmerizing work that is at once eerie and beautiful, a film that often seems like PICNIC AT HANGING ROCK as directed by David Lynch.” - Reeling Reviews  

THE NORTH AMERICAN BLU-RAY PREMIERE

Lucile Hadžihalilović’s breakthrough debut is a dreamlike descent into a secluded boarding school where nostalgia and dread intertwine for “a surreal and unexpectedly euphoric” (Sight & Sound) examination of young sisterhood. César, BAFTA and Academy Award® winner Marion Cotillard stars in this “haunting and hypnotic fairy tale” (Seattle Post-Intelligencer) that Indiewire hails as “at once a feminist parable and bedtime story that unfolds like a crouching animal, waiting to pounce.” INNOCENCE is accompanied by two of Hadžihalilović’s acclaimed shorts, DE NATURA and NECTAR, both featuring personal introductions. Viewers can further explore this world through "Innocence Explained" by young actress Zoé Auclair, a scholarly video essay by Alexandra Heller-Nicholas and a Q&A recorded at the IFC Center In October 2025.

Special Features:
  • Introduction By Lucile Hadžihalilović
  • Short Film DE NATURA With Introduction By Lucile Hadžihalilović
  • Short Film NECTAR With Introduction By Lucile Hadžihalilović
  • Innocence Explained By Actress Zoé Auclair
  • Video Essay By Alexandra Heller-Nicholas
  • Q&A At The IFC Center
  • Trailer

​Disc Specs:
Runtime: 122 mins
Audio: French Dolby DTS HD-Master Audio
Subtitles: English
Region A
Aspect Ratio: 2.35:1

Disc 2: EVOLUTION

“AN IMPECCABLE, CREEPY AND GENUINELY TRANSPORTING MOVIE.” - The New York Times

Lucile Hadžihalilović’s second feature is minimalist body horror about a boy who uncovers a mysterious world of inhuman biology and haunting transformation. Julie-Marie Parmentier (MURDEROUS MAIDS, FAREWELL MY QUEEN) stars in the startling film that has been described as “a gynocentric nightmare” (Chicago Reader), “a singular, daring vision” (Arizona Republic) and “a wondrous dream constantly on the verge of a nightmare” (Indiewire). This disc provides deep technical insight with a discussion between Hadžihalilović and cinematographer Manu Dacosse, alongside an interview with co-writer Alanté Kavaïté.

Special Features:
  • Introduction By Lucile Hadžihalilović
  • Discussion Between Cinematographer Manu Dacosse And Director Lucile Hadžihalilović
  • Interview With Writer Alanté Kavaïté
  • Trailer

​Disc Specs: 
Runtime: 81 mins
Audio: French Dolby DTS HD-Master Audio
Subtitles: English
Region A
Aspect Ratio: 2.35:1


Disc 3: EARWIG

“IT SPLITS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TENDERNESS AND TERROR.” - The Ringer

THE NORTH AMERICAN BLU-RAY PREMIERE

The third feature and English-language debut by “the emergent champion of slow-burn, surrealist cinema” (The Guardian) is a Kafkaesque fable of fatherhood, isolation and teeth made of ice. Paul Hilton (LADY MACBETH), Romola Garai (SUFFRAGETTE) and Alex Lawther (THE IMITATION GAME) star in Lucile Hadžihalilović’s surreal neo-noir that The New York Times calls “a trip down the darkest of rabbit holes,”  accompanied by what Sight & Sound hails as “enigmatic, oneiric visions that burrow their way into darker crevices of the viewer’s consciousness.” Adapted from the novel by Brian Catling (The Vorrh), EARWIG is deconstructed through Special Features that include interviews with the director, co-writer Geoff Cox and cinematographer Jonathan Ricquebourg.

Special Features:
  • Introduction By Lucile Hadžihalilović
  • Interview With Lucile Hadžihalilović
  • Interview With Co-Writer Geoff Cox
  • Interview With Cinematographer Jonathan Ricquebourg
  • Trailer

Disc Specs: 
Runtime: 114 mins
Audio: English Dolby DTS HD-Master Audio
Subtitles: English Closed Captions
Region A
Aspect Ratio: 2.35:1

Disc 4: THE ICE TOWER
​

“HADŽIHALILOVIĆ’S MOST ACCESSIBLE FILM TO DATE … A hypnotic mediation of coruscating, crystalline beauty. This is not so much a film you watch as one you wake up from, shivering.”
  - RogerEbert.com

​Two decades after the stunning breakthrough of INNOCENCE, Marion Cotillard reunites with writer/director Lucile Hadžihalilović for her award-winning fourth feature, a meta-fantasy freely inspired by Hans Christian Andersen's The Snow Queen. Clara Pacini, August Diehl (INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS) and Gaspar Noé co-star in this “mesmerizing and unnerving masterpiece in which reality, cinema, and fantasy become one of a kind” (Collider) from “a filmmaker with an uncompromising voice — one that continues to whisper strange, scary things into our ears” (The Hollywood Reporter). This final disc contains introspective content, including an interview by Beatrice Loayaza, two additional Q&As from the IFC Center, a second video essay by Alexandra Heller-Nicholas and a technical interview with Jonathan Ricquebourg.
​
Special Features:
  • Introduction By Lucile Hadžihalilović
  • Interview With Cinematographer Jonathan Ricquebourg
  • Interview With Lucile Hadžihalilović By Beatrice Loayaza
  • 2 Q&As At The IFC Center
  • Video Essay By Alexandra Heller-Nicholas
  • Trailer

Disc Specs: 
Runtime: 117 mins
Audio: French & English Dolby DTS HD-Master Audio
Subtitles: English
Region A
Aspect Ratio: 2.35:1
​

click here to pre-order from severin films

Picture
0 Comments

Stardate 04.27.2026.A: Happy Anniversary - 2006's 'Hatchet' Turns 20 Years Young Today!

4/27/2026

0 Comments

 
Picture
So many movies ... so much to celebrate!!!

On this day in 2006 (in the U.S.), audiences in attendance of the Tribeca Film Festival were treated to the glorious big screen debut of Hatchet.  Written and directed by Adam Green, the Horror/Thriller starred Kane Hodder, Joel David Moore, Deon Richmond, and others. 

According to our friends at IMDB.com, here's the plot summary:


"When a group of tourists in a New Orleans haunted swamp tour find themselves stranded in the wilderness, their evening of fun and spooks turns into a horrific nightmare."

For the record:
To the film's credit, Hatchet earned a good bit of praise from screenings on the film festival circuit.

ExtraExtra Alert:
In 2024, I received a complimentary new home video release of Hatchet (2006) from a distributor in exchange for review coverage on SciFiHistory.Net.  Interested readers can find my review right here.

-- EZ

From Google.com:

Key Aspects of the 2006 Film:

  • Plot: Tourists, including Ben (Joel David Moore) and Marybeth (Tamara Feldman), are stranded in a Louisiana swamp and hunted by a supernatural killer.
  • The Killer: Victor Crowley is played by horror icon Kane Hodder (known for playing Jason Voorhees).
  • Tone & Style: The film is characterized as an "old-school" slasher, prioritizing intense, bloody practical effects over CGI.
  • Cast & Cameos: The film features notable horror actors, including Robert Englund (A Nightmare on Elm Street) and Tony Todd (Candyman).
  • Reception: It has gained a cult following among fans of the genre for its self-aware, comedic approach, despite mixed reviews on its acting and story. 

The film, which has an 83-minute runtime, spawned a successful franchise, including several sequels.
0 Comments

Stardate 04.24.2026.A: Is 2026's 'Mamochka' Haunted By History, Possessed By Evil, Or Mired In Mediocrity? You Get To Decide.

4/24/2026

0 Comments

 
Picture
(NOTE: The following review will contain minor spoilers necessary solely for the discussion of plot and/or characters.  If you’re the type of reader who prefers a review entirely spoiler-free, then I’d encourage you to skip down to the last few paragraphs for the final assessment.  If, however, you’re accepting of a few modest hints at ‘things to come,’ then read on …)
 
From the film’s IMDB.com page citation:
“A psychological horror about a Nazi-era heirloom doll that drives a suburban dad crazy.”
 
Arguably, the trickiest element to producing any Horror film – big budget or small – is knowing precisely when to ‘play your hand.’
 
If the story’s chief antagonist is some specter or ghost, then the director and screenwriter likely need to figure out just when and how are the best ways to reveal its legendary backstory, the whole reason for its supernatural existence.  If the story’s baddie is some hungry, dream-inspired demon, then a great deal of thought goes in to the thing’s interactions with the cast and how to properly ratchet up the existential dread everyone feels when they come together.  If the story’s villain – or moral source of villainy – is some monster, then the creative crew will likely have undergone some debate about when and how much of the vile hobgoblin do we show: is it a protracted reveal after several players have fallen victim to its skullduggery, or do we go all-in within the first reel?
 
A good portion of this debate gets settled only when all involved know precisely the central foundation of wickedness is … and therein lies the problem with Mamochka (2026), an indie thriller written and directed by Vilan Trub.  I’ve just finished watched it on Blu-ray – a good presentation, especially considering there likely wasn’t a great deal of money invested in it – and I’m more than a bit befuddled.  Though I’m led to believe that this old doll was the singular heavy causing these characters’ dismay, the closing scene strongly suggests another culprit … one that could have one or two or maybe even three identities … and a strong argument could be made for the fact that even another person or other might also have heavily contributed to these dire predicaments that ultimately deliver us to no destination.
 
Young Derek Gajewski (played by Joshua Danskin) is a troubled child who kinda/sorta sees monsters where no one else does.  Naturally, his parents – Mark (Alexander Kollar) and Jane (Maya Murphy) – chalk it up to a boy’s overactive imagination as would probably any adult couple.  But when mommy and daddy are away one evening and the li’l sprite finds himself alone with a comely babysitter Sarah (Saidie Stone), Derek produces a – ahem – Dopp kit full of syringes, chooses one from the assortment, and administers a shot to the young woman.  Though we’re never shown exactly what happens or provided any sufficient explanation, whatever Sarah endured forces her to leave the house and child unattended, despondently spending the night in a nearby city park.
 
At this point, Mark and Jane don’t know what to make of their son’s behavior (mind you: neither do we in the audience!); and the narrative is suddenly hijacked to deal with Jane’s foul-mouthed tirades against her recently deceased mother.  Her only inheritance is an old doll with a porcelain skull and a thick head of hair.  Thinking that it could perhaps be worth some money as an antique, Mark opens dialogue with a conveniently nearby ‘doll doctor,’ Mr. Ralph Finkelstein (Andrew Steiner).  Ralph explains that he believes that the oversized figure was, in fact, manufactured by Nazis; and he asserts that luscious head of hair it sprouts possibly came from the head of a Jewish victim of the concentration camps.  This development sparks the father’s sudden fascination with 1930’s and 1940’s German history.
 
Given that Trub’s tale invested this much in what looks like a creepy doll centerpiece, I suspect a great many folks watching will be happy to know what this carnival attraction finally is; however, now Mamochka twists again, with Mark waking up and waking up and waking up again and again and again seemingly in some time loop wherein viewers are left questioning how much of what’s been shown is real versus the product of the middle-aged video editor’s dreams.  His sanity cracks – as would anyone’s – and he’s now creating people out of thin air – a curious stranger (Dino Castelli) delivers a letter that’s never opened and seemingly forgotten – and he directs the resulting frustration on his wife and his drinking buddy Gary (David Beckles Jr.) in what by all accounts looks to be a grim finale.
 
Well …
 
It’s at this point that – ahem – ol’ foul-mouthed Jane wakes up on a bright sunny morning seemingly with no memory of her husband or anything else we, the viewers, have just watched.  The flick closes with her taking young Derek for a car ride, and the woman notices that – albeit briefly – the boy has the face of the mysterious mail-delivering stranger.
 
Huh.
 
Of course, I could attempt to decipher what all of this was meant to mean, but methinks what Trub and his cast and crew have constructed is little more than a convenient ‘mindfuck’ they intended to be the talk of the town (or the film festival circuit).  Somewhere, there’s an audience for this stuff – the kind that has ample time on their hands for just watching films and then gathering at the bar to make of them what they will – and that’s perfectly fine.  But out here?  In reality?  What remains is ninety-minute train ride with little scenery and no bankable conclusion.  The picture is filled with the usual suspect of Horror tropes – many of them put to good use – along with some muddling dialogue between actors and actresses who make the best of gibberish intended to be somehow reverential if not minor related.  But given the fact that Mamochka lacks a central cohesive thread – a throughline that exists every step of the way – I’ve fundamentally no way to reach any rational assessment as to what happened much less what I’m supposed to make of it.
 
Confusing and dull, this Mamochka should’ve stayed left in the box at the store.
 
Mamochka (2026) was produced by Trub Film Co.  DVD distribution (for this particular release) has been coordinated by the fine folks at Allied Vaugh.  As to the technical specifications?  While I’m no trained video expert, I can still assure readers that the provided sights and sounds are very good considering that you go in entirely aware that it’s an independent movie.  Sets are plain.  Effects work is minor.  What visual trickery there is modestly but effectively supports the narrative.  Lastly, if you’re looking for special features?  The disc boasts a few deleted scenes along with trailers for other productions available from the production company.
 
Alas … this one remains Hard To Recommend.
 
As an indie thriller, Mamochka showed a bit of promise here and there; but, sadly, it just doesn’t deliver with any single workable premise.  In fact, what there is boils down almost to a kinda/sorta “Choose Your Own Adventure” yarn when it comes to figuring out precisely what all the fuss was about.  My bugaboo with smaller and more intimate chillers – which this one is – is that it still has to both establish understood rules and then play by them: this one doesn’t, instead leading viewers down whatever rabbit hole seemed like the best idea at the time.  Disappointing.
 
In the interests of fairness, I’m pleased to disclose that the fine folks at Trub Film Co. (via the distributor Allied Vaughn) provided me with a complimentary Blu-ray of Mamochka (2026) by request for the expressed purpose of completing this review.  Their contribution to me in no way, shape, or form influenced my opinion of it.

​-- EZ
​
0 Comments

Stardate 04.23.2026.B: Actress Angelica Lee Grounds 2002's Ghostly 'The Eye' With An Incredible Central Performance

4/23/2026

0 Comments

 
Picture
​Back in the days of my youth, I had the privilege of taking a few college courses on the nature of filmmaking.
 
One of the biggest lessons I can recall is that – aesthetically – techniques should be avoided when and if their use pushes the audience out of the viewing experience.  While it sounded simple to my uneducated ears, the concept quickly grew a bit more complex; and the professor criticized such things as having characters speak directly to the camera as well as visual tricks (i.e. split screens, text overlays, some optical inserts, etc.) as being practices that by the very nature interrupt an established narrative flow.  His point was that, in a theater, one is supposed to observe, not read.  When thrown out of the story even for an instant, the viewer gets reminded that he or she are safe, not part of what’s happening, and merely witnessing the action.  Sitting in the auditorium, he or she are instead watching a story unfold more as a consumer technologically invested in the events as opposed to, say, being a voyeur watching things occur organically.  In some cases, visual trickery pulls back the curtain in such a way that it hijacks entirely what living experience looks like (or should look like), turning the film or television episode into nothing more than images rendered with nothing relatable expressed.
 
(College.  Am I right?)
 
Experience has shown me that such a position – while critically laudable – isn’t always the way storytelling works most impactfully, especially in the modern era.  Today, audiences have grown vastly more tech-savvy than they were back in the 80’s and 90’s; and a growing number of projects have specifically made exceptional use of visual inserts and even ‘breaking the fourth wall’ to the point wherein I can’t imagine returning to a day wherein these things didn’t transpire in some way.  Granted, they probably should still be used sparingly – I don’t think I’ve ever seen split screen used wherein something less intrusive would’ve worked as well – but the point here is that when it comes to winning over the audience a director should minimally to welcome whatever bold new strategy he or she thinks works best.
 
All of this brings me to The Eye (2002), a rather entertaining flick that – with a few others – deservedly helped shine a bit of light on the emerging Asian Horror market.  Written and directed by the team of Danny Pang and Oxide Chun Pang (with some screenwriting contributions also attributed to Yuet-Jan Hui), the picture starred Angelica Lee, Chutcha Rujinanon, Lawrence Chou, Candy Lo, Yut Lai So, and others.  Its story bobs and weaves around the possible spectral connections passed from one person to another when a corneal transplant unexpectedly opens the door into the world of the supernatural for the recipient; and what emerges is a smart examination of the psychological impact such revelations render as a consequence of the exchange.
 
(NOTE: The following review will contain minor spoilers necessary solely for the discussion of plot and/or characters.  If you’re the type of reader who prefers a review entirely spoiler-free, then I’d encourage you to skip down to the last few paragraphs for the final assessment.  If, however, you’re accepting of a few modest hints at ‘things to come,’ then read on …)
 
From the film’s IMDB.com page citation:
“A blind girl gets a cornea transplant so that she will be able to see again. She gets more than she bargained for upon realizing she can also see ghosts.”
 
The Eye opens with a bit of cinematic trickery that some might think was a waste of a modest gag.  Essentially, audiences were made to believe that the first reel was playing only to have it very quickly seized up and frozen in place.  When this happened historically, the film itself would overheat from the constant exposure of the projector lamp; and it wasn’t uncommon for the strip to fully melt in front of the eyes of the audience.  What follows is a bit of a jump scare with noise, only for the story to then kinda/sorta reset with the actual yarn being spun taking place.
 
In the past, such a deliberate subterfuge was like thought to be trickery beneath the skills of good storytellers as well as a cheap feint pulled on the viewers; but – for what it’s worth – this maneuver might be seen today as demonstrating what the remaining 100 minutes proves but in a lean and mean few seconds.  That is “don’t always believe what you see at your own peril.”
 
Wong Kar-mun (played brilliantly by Angelica Lee) has been blind from an early age.  When the opportunity for her sight to be returned via transplant, she welcomes the chance to experience all of her senses once again.  Slowly over the course of a few days, she begins to make the recovery to the point wherein muddled light and shadows begin to take shape; and yet there’s often a curiously obscured figure in the background.  Uncertain of what or even who it might be, she dismisses it … only to late one night awaken to see an elderly woman in the next bed being escorted from the room they share.  In the morning, she’s a bit aghast to learn that the woman has passed despite seeing in good health and good spirits only hours before.
 
It’s this ‘stepping through the doorway into the world again’ that the Pang Brothers rather elegantly orchestrate throughout their film’s set-up.  We – as voyeurs – get the chance to see through Kar-mun’s eyes at several spots; so we – like her – get enough information to make an informed judgement as to what’s taking place.  Over the course of these reasonably minor incidents – i.e. a suited executive standing in traffic, a young child seeking his lost report card, a gentleman standing mutely transfixed in the back of an elevator, etc. – both she and we begin to realize that the veil between reality and the spirit world has somehow been removed.  These specters turn out to be the recently deceased, and they’ve been held over in our plane of existence owed to what is suggested to be unfinished business.
 
Eventually, Kar-mun seeks an explanation for what she’s enduring.  Joined by the psychotherapist who’s aiding in her adjustment to sight again – Dr. Wah (Lawrence Chou) – she travels to Thailand to learn more about her late donor, Ling (Chutcha Rujinanon).  It’s there that the pair discover that Ling was gifted with the curse of precognition – the ability to see into the near future – and they learn that the girl was ostracized to the point of suicide by the townsfolk she only tried to use her ability to help.  Helping to give Ling’s mother the emotional closure she’s been suffering from, Kar-mun and Wah believe they’ve achieved the balance that’ll finally grant our young protagonist some peace; but the truth is there’s one more tragedy the universe has in store, and it might just lead to the deaths of many.
 
Under their direction, the Pang Brothers deliver a sometime melancholy Horror film that works on every conceivable level.  Though they rely on a great deal of risky visual trickery, they manage to keep the story moving so much so that the viewers never have any reason to question the veracity of these visions, nor are they given room enough to dismiss the premise and various subplots as nothing more than spectral shenanigans.  These ghosts aren’t all that scary: it’s the circumstances of their creation which are necessarily dark but emphasize life isn’t always neat, clean, and pretty.  Stuck momentarily in limbo between worlds, they still need to crossover; and the Pangs at all times cover these matters of life and death with almost reverential intrigue.
 
The Eye (2002) was produced by Film Workshop, Applause Pictures, and Mediacorp Raintree Pictures.  DVD distribution (for this particular release) has been coordinated by the fine folks at Arrow Films.  As for the technical specifications?  While I’m no trained video expert, I can assure readers that the provided sights and sounds are exceptional: yes, there are some opening sequences definitely shot out of focus, but as viewers quickly learn that is part and parcel of how the directors are taking them on this journey.  It gets better as it goes.  Lastly, if you’re looking for special features?  The disc boasts some excellent behind-the-scenes stuff (most of which is archival), but there’s a great newly produced interview with producer Peter Ho-Sun Chan that’s fabulous.  There’s also a video essay from critic Heather Wixson which is good, but methinks it wanders off into gender roles a bit too much to make as much impact as it could’ve.
 
Strongly Recommended.
 
I do recall watching The Eye (2002) probably two decades ago on home video, but I honestly don’t remember it looking this good.  Arrow’s presentation is top notch; and the added details in this upgrade certainly give the Pang Brothers’ story a welcome boost of adrenaline when it needs it most.  Actress Lee is a revelation here, handling the breadth of emotions with an almost childlike innocence at times until the point wherein catastrophe requires her to give it much more.  A few of the early scenes get a bit too bittersweet for me, but she still delivers a journey from start-to-finish that’s deserving of all the acclaim she received here.  It’s equally heartfelt and frenetic when required.
 
In the interests of fairness, I’m pleased to disclose that the fine folks at Arrow Films provided me with a complimentary Blu-ray copy of The Eye (2002) by request for the expressed purpose of completing this review.  Their contribution to me in no way, shape, for form influenced my opinion of it.

-- EZ
0 Comments

Stardate 04.23.2026.A: Happy Anniversary - 2019's 'I Spit On Your Grave: Deja Vu' Turns 7 Years Young Today!

4/23/2026

0 Comments

 
Picture
So many movies ... so much to celebrate!!!

On this day in 2019 (in the U.S.), the grave-spitting tour of pure vengeance returned when I Spit On Your Grave: Deja Vu enjoyed its release on home video.  Written and directed by Meir Zarchi, the film starred Camille Keaton, Jamie Bernadette, Maria Olsen, and others. 

​According to our friends at IMDB.com, here's the plot summary:


"Cinema's top lethal lady vengeance returns in the most anticipated sequel of all time."

-- EZ

0 Comments

Stardate 04.22.2026.A: Newest Addition - 2002's 'American Psycho 2: All American Girl' Has Been Added To The Daily Archives For April 22nd

4/22/2026

0 Comments

 

site update

Picture
So many movies ... so little time ...

On this day in 2002 (in the United Kingdom), American Psycho 2: All American Girl went back to the crazies for its debut on home video.  Directed by Morgan J. Freeman from a story by Alex Sanger, Karen Craig, and Bret Easton Ellis, the film starred Mila Kunis, William Shatner, Robin Dunne, and others. 

​According to our friends at IMDB.com, here's the plot summary:


"A girl named Rachael Newman has developed a taste for murder and will stop at nothing to become a college professor's assistant."

-- EZ
​
0 Comments
<<Previous

    Reviews
    ​Archive
    ​

    Reviews

    Daily
    ​Trivia
    Archives
    ​

    January
    February
    March
    April
    May
    June
    July
    August
    September
    October
    November
    December

    original content
    ​

    July 2026
    June 2026
    May 2026
    April 2026
    March 2026
    February 2026
    January 2026
    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly