SCIFIHISTORY.NET
  • MAINPAGE
  • About
  • Reviews

Stardate 04.11.2017.A: Colony Reviewed - Did Carlton Cuse Learn Nothing From Lost?

4/11/2017

 
Picture
The more I watch USA Network’s alien invasion drama Colony the more convinced I grow that longtime television producer Carlton Cuse learned nothing from the debacle he engineered better known as ABC TV’s Lost.  And LOST it was!

​For those caught unaware, let me explain: those island castaways second only in pop cultural relevance to Gilligan and his friends are Jack, Sawyer, Kate, and a veritable Greek tragedy of others and extras, and TV audiences were captivated with their collective adventures for most of six mystery-fueled seasons.
  Though Lost was created by JJ Abrams, Jeffrey Lieber, and the creatively-challenged Damon Lindelof, I’ve been led to understand that it was Cuse and Lindelof who were its central storytellers up through the program’s controversial finish.  Both men have strongly dismissed any hullabaloo over that ending, claiming that it was never the countless unsolved mysteries spread across the show’s 121 episodes that interested the viewers but instead was its ‘characters.’  In their humble estimation (and I’m paraphrasing): “You didn’t care about what Kate knew and when she knew it; you cared about Kate.”

Ahem.

Sadly, it didn’t take a brain surgeon to diagnose that all of those unfortunate souls were going to end up dead in Lost’s big finish (we can split hairs all you like, but “dead is dead” when you’re waiting for your friends to show up in whatever Heavenly ‘construct’ you’ve gathered in the Afterlife to share); and die-hard fans were understandably infuriated.
  Of course, the fact that both Cuse and Lindelof had spent the better part of those six seasons denying that Lost would all wrap up with these characters we cared (oh!) so much about being deceased didn’t help matters much, but even today they persist with a petulant “it’s not me, it’s you” attitude if and when the subject comes up.  (This isn’t a reflection upon the quality of the finale, though I’ll admit to being disappointed; it’s only meant as a response upon how that franchise ended so far as its showrunners and fandom matter.)

A season or two after Lost, Cuse found critical success again with Bates Motel on the A&E Network.
  Meant to be a kinda/sorta prequel to Alfred Hitchcock’s seminal Psycho (1960), Bates focused on the dangerously out-of-the-norm relationship between whacky young Norman and his wackier mother Norma.  My wife and I hung with the show long enough to realize that Cuse and his merry band of writers gave the lovely and idyllic White Pine Bay – the show’s fictional setting – more behind-the-scenes skullduggery than you’d find in a typical block of Tiajuana.  Our two cents?  You remove what made the original Psycho special when you populate its backdrop with an entire citizenry capable of the Norma/Norman dynamic, and that just didn’t interest us.

Picture
These days, Cuse can be found in the realm of Colony; and – so far as Seasons 1 and 2 are concerned – he’s back to his usual antics so aptly demonstrated with Lost: audiences are treated to an alien invasion that never shows its aliens, never divulges who they are or why they came, and never truly hints at what’s up.

Along for the ride is a talented cast, and that helps make the occasionally mushy meal go down a bit easier.
  Josh Holloway leads as the hunky Will Bowman, a former soldier who briefly finds a job amongst the ruling elite only to use it for his own purposes.  Fresh from The Walking Dead Sarah Wayne Callies shines as his wife, Katie, who fights to keep her identity as a member of Earth’s resistance from her family.  TV staples like Amanda Righetti, Adrian Pasdar, and Ally Walker fill out supporting roles, and each one of them acts with varying degrees of deceit largely for no purpose other than staying alive.  The real breakout (so far as this watcher is concerned) is Peter Jacobson; his constantly duplicitous Alan Snyder keeps finding ways to make others trust him even though he’s arguably the entire casts’ worst enemy.  His is a great centerpiece around which all else good or bad intersects; whether that was creatively intended matters not when its delivered so winningly by Jacobson.

Like most first seasons, Colony spent a great deal of time introducing these characters and what remains of our world: major cities have been walled off by the aliens (presumably), and their citizens have been separated into different classes.
  Some folks share in leadership roles, some are black-garbed soldiers enforcing alien decree, while others are left to carve out a life for themselves with what remains.  Still others have vanished to a secret location known only as ‘The Factory’; it’s unclear what purpose the place serves, exactly where it is, and whether it produces anything … though with a name like ‘The Factory’ I’m suspecting it isn’t iPhones.  Largely, day-to-day civilization is made up of different resistance cells, none of which appear to have any defined purpose much less a willingness to cooperate with one another.  Frankly, it’s all a bit nebulous, and I suppose that’s by design.

Still, that first roster of episodes gave Will Bowman a singular resolution: keep the family safe.

​
Picture
This simplicity of purpose boiled over into Colony’s second season, one which saw Bowman secreted beyond the city walls to finally find his son Charlie who’d been missing since the Occupation began.  That dedication to purpose paid off in what I think have been the program’s best hours: young actor Jacob Buster turned in a great performance as Charlie, a young soul damaged by the savage life he’d led.  Seeing his son reduced to little more than animal instincts forced Will to “even the scales” with the street thug who robbed the boy of his childhood.  The family was eventually reunited, even if only for brief happiness; sadly, the second half of the season saw Will and company on-the-run, with few allies, and almost directionless except for food, water, and shelter.

Much like Lost, Colony suffers greatly from its preponderance with mystery.
  Each successive episode seems content to add yet one more layer to a story already dense enough for ten onions.  Nothing is ever given quite clear definition, and – by doing so – lines are blurred by a seemingly endless array of guest characters who come in and go out the show’s revolving fantasy door.  These faces serve no real purpose, none other than what they accomplish briefly on screen; and then they vanish into the ether (or until they’re resurrected a broadcast hour or two later).  As I said above, who these aliens are much less what they want has never been discussed in any depth nor even hinted at; you’d think that these characters would occasionally question one another about their shared circumstance, but instead they’ve apparently accepted their lot in life (or in this week’s script) and simply go about the task at hand.  Much like the audience, they’re expected to suspend disbelief all for the sake of playing along.

Much like Lost, Colony only grows more confusing, the end result of piling mystery upon mystery upon mystery.
  And, like bad magicians, Cuse and his stable of writers ask the audience to watch “over here” as nothing of substance (i.e. plot development) is really going on “over there.”  Instead, it looks like they’re crafting yet one more show where viewers are supposed to care more about characters than you are what’s really the point of it all; and I can’t help but wonder what cards they’re left to play with Season Three.  (In case you missed it, it was recently reported that production for next year’s episodes is shifting from California to Vancouver; I suspect some talent might depart in the process, and that may not bode well for its future.)
​
Picture
Now, let me be perfectly blunt on one point: Colony is not a bad show, per se.  As I said, the cast is talented and likable.  The production qualities remain high enough to keep a respectable spot on the television dial.  Though its overall mythology has grown more and more muddled, I hold out hope that its central premise – that of a family in conflict merely trying to survive against increasing odds – will always stay relevant.  (Heck, it was good enough for Lost In Space’s Robinsons clan, and it even made The Brady Bunch interesting at times.)  That dynamic has worked for hundreds of shows so long as the Boob Tube has been around.

But at some point, answers are deserved … a sentiment perhaps “lost” on the likes of Carlton Cuse.

Stardate 04.10.2017.A: Never Fear, Saber Raine Is Here!

4/10/2017

 
Picture
I grew up with a firm grounding in what I’ve always called ‘pulp culture.’  A local, backwater, AM radio station played old-time radio dramas in its overnight rotation, so – as a listener – I stayed awake with a blanket over my head listening to The Shadow, Flash Gordon, and Buck Rogers.  Mind you, in those days it wasn’t as easy to explore fandom the way you can today (what with the click of a mouse), so it took some time to acquire a collection of records, tapes, and (eventually) books with which to grow even more familiar with the subject matter.

​
Certainly, I wasn’t alone in my appreciation as the B-Movie culture of the 1970’s and 1980’s fueled an assortment of similar storytelling, with an entry occasionally breaking through even to mainstream theatres.  These releases caught fire in the home video market of that era when it was learned that consumers were perfectly happy renting something they were a bit too embarrassed to sit through on the silver screen but was acceptable Saturday-Night-With-A-Sixpack viewing.  Still, most of these films pushed more toward splatter and gore, leaving the Science Fiction and Fantasy elements mostly the stomping ground for syndicated television programs.

Folks like Roger Corman and Lloyd Kaufman did what they could to satiate audiences hungry for more cinematic fare … and it’s largely in that tradition that a flick like STAR RAIDERS: THE ADVENTURES OF SABER RAINE earns its street cred.  Granted, it may not be as flashy or garish as some of what came before, but it’s got more heart and chutzpah than much of what’s come since.

Picture
(NOTE: The following review will contain minor spoilers necessary solely for the discussion of plot and/or characters.  If you’re the type of reader who prefers a review entirely spoiler-free, then I’d encourage you to skip down to the last three paragraphs for my final assessment.  If, however, you’re accepting of a few modest hints at ‘things to come,’ then read on …)

From the publicity materials:
“Rocket ships, Rayguns, and Robots abound in this heart-pounding tale where the stellar adventurer Saber Raine is hired to guide three elite soldiers on a rescue mission to a mysterious planet on the outer rim of the galaxy …”

Now, let me be perfectly clear: I like pulp.  Always have.  Always will.

Pulp sensibilities have long-fueled a seemingly endless array of B-Movie pictures, a class of film that today’s younger viewers rarely understand or appreciate.  For that reason, you may find this review is a bit more forgiving than the next with respect to enjoying what STAR RAIDERS: THE ADVENTURES OF SABER RAINE had to offer.  In short, I “got” it.  I don’t think most of today’s YouTube-obsessed, ADD-stricken media will, though they’ll say they did and maybe even suggest that you can find better.  (Helpful tip: you can always find better.)  Sure, when it comes to pulp there are varying gradations of quality, but it’s the sense of wonder, fantasy, and adventure that matter most, and – in those measurables – RAIDERS performs affably though a bit inefficiently if not downright clumsily at times.
​

Picture
Saber Raine – as played by STARSHIP TROOPERS’ Casper Van Dien – is a SciFi archetype: he’s meant to be the dashing space hero who’ll rush in where angels fear to tread.  One part Captain James T. Kirk mixed with two parts of Buck Rogers, he’ll face the odds and invariably emerge as the victor mostly because that’s entirely how he’s written, not necessarily played.  Van Dien certainly looks the mold, though he’s got a bit more mileage under his belt here than he did in TROOPERS.  However, he and his strong chin and chiseled good looks represent the best this type of cinema has to offer: even when fallen on hard times, he’ll stick to his guns when a lesser lead would’ve hightailed it for distant shores.

And – like Flash Gordon – Raine is destined to meet an assortment of characters along the way who’ll start as adversaries but end up as allies.  Fade (the lovely Brit Laree) hires Raine to lead her through these ‘Badlands,’ and she’ll slowly turn from ‘unimpressed employer’ to romantically interested.  Her companions – Commander Voss (Andy Hankins) and Ryll (Will Beckingham) – are soldiers who initially cringe at Raine’s casualness but eventually embrace his derring-do.  Of course, there’s always an “old friend” wrapped up in the mix – one who begrudgingly allows Raine his unconventional ways – and that role is handily filled by Crotalus (Holly Westwood), an alien who’s tied to her friend’s past professional disgrace.

Where STAR RAIDERS’ fails to live up to its potential as pulp is in the creation of its villains: Sinjin (James Lew) totes a galaxy-size grudge against the Aerisian people due to the theft of ancient secrets, something he needs to recover if he’s going to make good on his conquest of known space.  To achieve his ends, he’s kidnapped the royal heirs from Ares – Tyr (Tyler Weaver Jr.) and Caliope (Sara N. Salazar) – and tortures them … though it remains a bit unclear what he hopes to extort.  (There’s a later hint at power and technology, but nothing of a real threat materializes until the film promises a sequel when Caliope joins Sinjin in a last reel reveal.)  To complicate matters, Sinjin’s brought along a cadre of conspirators, none of whom is all that ‘evil’ except for looking decidedly inhuman.
​
Picture
See, evil must have a goal.  Ming The Merciless was hell bent on destroying Earth.  Star Wars’ Emperor Palpatine wanted every planet to answer to his bidding.  The Nazis wanted God on their side, with only Indiana Jones to stand in their way.  By contrast, RAIDERS’ Sinjin has an axe to grind over what amounts to ancient stolen technology, but the audience is never really shocked or awed by his promise as the big baddie.  Sure, he can apparently reanimate the dead, but these days that’s quite passé as a good virus accomplishes that in every B-picture.  The bigger the badassery, the more convinced I would’ve been by Caliope’s turn to this universe’s “dark side,” but instead I was only treated to the threat of future violence, and that just didn’t convince.

So while I was completely smitten with RAIDERS’ embrace of its obvious pulp roots, I found the second half a bit floundering, much of it owed to the fact that I had little idea of what its evil really wanted to accomplish.  It’s never enough to merely want power unless that wish is backed with what’s truly at stake; and that’s sorely missing here.  Also, at times its players seemed to forget the fact that this was a pulp feature, occasionally not performing “big enough” to sell me on their characters’ convictions: Van Dien never quite established his tongue in his cheek, Salazar never quite understood she needed to emerge as the focus of evil, and even Laree never quite swooned deeply enough as the love interest.

The galaxy is a big canvas, and I’d welcome Saber Raine’s return, if nothing else for a chance to truly get it right, play bigger than life, and save the day against all odds.  Some audiences still cheer (and always will) for the good guy, even when the budget’s a bargain, the aliens are obviously talent under a mask, and effects are on-the-cheap.  In fact, that’s part of the charm!
​
Picture
STAR RAIDERS: THE ADVENTURES OF SABER RAINE is produced by Uptown G Productions, Fusion Factory Films, and Don’t Pose Productions.  DVD distribution is being handled by the respectable Gravitas Ventures.  As for the technical merits?  The sights and sounds are overall pretty solid – the CG footage in the opening reels is TV-grade but some of the laser bolts and explosions later in the flick are occasionally overboard in their ‘camp.’  Sadly, there are no special features (always a miss as this viewer loves them).

RECOMMENDED.  STAR RAIDERS – as imperfect as it may be – represents a form of cinematic storytelling that these days is far too often considered substandard for all the wrong reasons, usually being outright dismissed by highbrow critics because it was fan-funded, direct-to-DVD released, or conceived and produced outside of a more traditional studio system.  However, that’s part of what makes these efforts endearing: they’re greater labors of love, meant to tickle the fancies of those who appreciate a bit of shlock in their entertainment diets and maybe a little more “swash in their buckle.”  Fans of 80’s cinema or even mid-1970’s Science Fiction still eat these things alive; and I, for one, would welcome the promised sequel of the last reel, though I fear it’ll never see the light of day.

In the interests of fairness, I’m pleased to disclose that the fine folks at Gravitas Ventures provided me with an online means to view STAR RAIDERS: THE ADVENTURES OF SABER RAINE by request for the expressed purposes of completing this review; and their contribution to me in no way, shape, or form influenced my opinion of it.

Stardate 04.07.2017.A: April 7th Is Another 50+ SciFi day!

4/7/2017

 
Picture
Happy Friday, faithful SciFiHistory.Net readers!

​Nothing much to report today ... except that we've reached another highwater mark for today's date as April 7th now has 50 individual SciFi-related citations on its Daily Page (which you can access right here).  Those who've followed closely know that my expressed goal is to eventually have 100 citations for every day, and it's nice to know that we're well on our way!

​As always, thanks for reading ... and live long and prosper!

Stardate 04.06.2017.B: Just What Is SciFiHistory.Net?

4/6/2017

 
Picture
Just the other day, I received an email inquiry from a reader about SciFiHistory.Net which basically asked -- in a nutshell -- "What IS SciFiHistory.Net?"  After putting a little bit of thought into it, I thought it appropriate to respond in these pages for the sake of posterity.

​Essentially, I started SciFiHistory.Net as a means to daily celebrate what I term 'All Things SciFi.'  Looking around the web, I saw that several of the major SciFi and/or Fantasy franchises had their own 'portals' (if you will) to highlight to significant events (births, movies, TV episode airings, etc.) of their respective properties.  Star Trek has a huge Wiki presence, as does Stargate and Battlestar Galactica (old and new).  Doctor Who has several that I've been able to find.  There's even an online registry (of sorts) for writers, authors, and screenwriters I'll occasionally consult.  Also, IMDB.com clearly is an exhaustive accounting of all things related to the entertainment industry.  But what I didn't see was one place dedicated to (as I said) 'All Things SciFi,' so I figured that might be the means to best make an imprint, establish a brand, and go from there.

​Basically, I'm a one-man-shop (but, hey, don't let that stop you from asking to get involved, folks!) with a desire to bring anyone and everyone aboard who celebrates SciFi from whatever perspective.  This sites Daily Pages will highlight the significant achievements I've been able to fully research and account for (again, I'm updating the information a little bit each day), and this -- what I call the 'MainPage' area -- is for other little niceties: ShoutOuts to others, film and book reviews, announcements, trivia ... the sky's the limit.  Heck, I even thought it appropriate to include this brief article explaining who I am, what I do, and what you can find here.

​So YES SciFiHistory.Net is always willing to receive any submissions any interested party wants to make to this space or even the spaces inside.  For example, I recently received a request from a celebrity's lawyer asking me to remove a specific photograph used to highlight that actor's resume; I swapped it out with a different one, and no trouble was had.  Also, I recently received a request from an actor asking to be cited on his birthday; he even went so far as to provide me with information he wished to have included in his citation.  Furthermore, I've received film reviews from others on the web, and I'm always happy to include them so long as (A) the content relates to SciFi and/or Fantasy and (B) the content can be edited (if needed) by yours truly.

​That said, this is the kind of site I'd personally like to see grow and change as it needs.  I think there really are no limitations needing to be imposed when it comes to celebrating fandom, and, sure, if anyone is interested in having their content linked from here I'm happy to consider.  Again, please realize that occasionally I have time and space limitations (as do we all), but I've found that New Media works best when it knows no end to including all potential takers, movers, and shakers.

​If you'd have anything you'd like to submit, then feel free to contact me directly at [email protected].

Stardate 04.06.2017.A: Colony Season 01 Citations Up'n'Running

4/6/2017

 
Picture
Greetings and Happy Thursday to all of our regular (and irregular) readers!

​After posting yesterday's announcement about USA Network's Colony being renewed for its third season, I spent a few moments going through the related Daily Citations and (finally) have all of the show's first season listings up'n'running.  As is the case, you'll see them mentioned only on those Day Pages, and I'm also still working on a Season Two "review" (of sorts) that'll be coming once I get everything viewed.  (I believe I'm current and just waiting for the Season Two finale which I think is this week; if so, then I'll probably have something posted early next week, depending upon my workload and life challenges.)

​In any event, thanks for reading ... and live long and prosper!

Stardate 04.05.2017.B: Colony Making Changes For Season 3

4/5/2017

 
Picture
Yesterday's Deadline made the announcement that USA Network greenlight Carlton Cuse's SciFi/Drama Colony for a third season but not without a kinda/sorta big change: production will be moving from the expensive California locations to Vancouver.

​Meh.  I read that article with honestly a bit of surprise.  This isn't to say that I'm disappointed with the program as I'm not; it's just that Cuse (as a producer) really should've taken the lessons learned from his long stint with ABC TV's Lost and applied them to this show's storytelling.  I've been tinkering with a collective review of Season 2, and I'll get it up once the show's season finale airs.  Keep your eyes peeled at this space.

​As always, thanks for reading ... and live long and prosper!

Stardate 04.05.2017.A: No Tribble At All (Retro) Reviews Andy Weir's The Martian

4/5/2017

 
Picture
Coming in today from our "Friends Of SciFiHistory.Net" Department is Jessica Osborne's latest blob post in which she reviews Andy Weir's The Martian which everyone knows was subsequently turned into a blockbuster with Matt Damon.  From what I understand, it's a very solid read (I've personally never read it, though it's one of those tomes I've picked up while browsing in the corner bookstore from time to time yet still not purchased), and I encourage everyone to check out what Jess has to say on the subject.

You can access her review right here.

​As always, thanks for reading ... and live long and prosper!

Stardate 04.04.2017.A: Rogue One On Home Video Today!

4/4/2017

 
Picture
I don't know what you did this morning, but I stopped by the local WalMart and picked up my household copy of Rogue One: A Star Wars Story that came out on home video this morning.  I suspect that Star Wars purists will definitely be following suit.

​I realize that there was a group of diehard fans who picked practically everything apart about this Original Trilogy prequel, but I'm already on record as saying I had a lot of fun with the feature.  Sure, I had a quibble here and a quibble there, but -- all in all -- it was most decidedly grand to be back in that OT era where the Empire was crushing systems and Rebels were always on-the-run.  Plus, I think the film had vastly more interesting characters than the JJ Abrams' fan-fiction release that was Star Wars: Episode VII - The Force Awakens (with a few minor exceptions), and this really only added to the tense undercurrent of this fantastic space war picture.

​After seeing Rogue One in theatres, I didn't pen any in-depth critique of it, but I did sound off on what I thought were the key elements, so -- for the sake of posterity -- I'll post a link to my review right here for anyone who wants to look back at it.  Otherwise, I just encourage you to be a good consumer, a committed fan to All Things SciFi, pick up a copy, slap it in the DVD player, and run it on a loop all day.  You'll be glad you did.

​Plus, as I've mentioned twice now in the past week, it's never too late to start getting your thoughts together for May, 2017, as the Star Wars franchise is turning forty years young!  If you'd like to sound off on that, then I'd most definitely love to hear from you.  Drop me any submissions at [email protected].

​In the meantime, thanks for reading ... and May the Force be with you!

Stardate 04.03.2017.D: Falling Water Still Dripping Onward

4/3/2017

 
Picture
For those who are still swimming in USA Networks' really, really quirky SciFi series Falling Water, I just noticed via Deadline.com (link) that the suits have renewed the show for a second season.

​Frankly, I tuned this one out after about five episodes.  This isn't to say that I wasn't interested in what I did see: I was, but the problem I had after five hours was that it didn't appear as if anyone within this world had any idea of what was going on, and this only promoted greater confusion to me (as a viewer).  I'm all for what can definitely be called 'mindfreaks' but I'll only stick with it so long as there's confirmation that it's all going somewhere ... and Falling Water just didn't feel all that cohesive to this casual viewer.

​Who knows?  It may develop into the kind of programming that's better imbibed via binge viewing, as I hate dragging my feet for too long before answers are provided.

​In any event, thanks for reading ... and live long and prosper!

Stardate 04.03.2017.C: SciFi ShoutOut - Shane Plays Celebrates Multiple Fandoms

4/3/2017

 
Picture
Sadly, I've never been "bitten" nor "smitten" with the gaming bug.  This isn't to say that I'm completely unaware of the gaming community at large; I have basic awareness of it, but that's honestly the extent of my knowledge of it.  In all honesty, I've just never been any good at games and the like, so I've ignored most of the properties, though I've had the chance to review several "based on" properties, be they books, graphic novels, or films.

​Still, I have nothing but respect for folks who continue to fan the flames of fandom at every opportunity, and this morning I discovered Shane Plays via Krypton Radio (which I'm listening to right now).  Geeks, nerds, gamers, and general fans are encouraged to check it out (link right here) as it definitely falls within the realm of Science Fiction and Fantasy, and -- so far as what I've listened to -- the quality is decidedly high.  Major, major kudos to all involved.

​As always, thanks for reading ... and live long and prosper!
<<Previous
Forward>>

    Reviews
    ​Archive
    ​

    Reviews

    Daily
    ​Trivia
    Archives
    ​

    January
    February
    March
    April
    May
    June
    July
    August
    September
    October
    November
    December

    mainpage
    ​ posts

    December 2025
    November 2025
    October 2025
    September 2025
    August 2025
    July 2025
    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly